Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
What do you guys consider the better one off win ?
Douglas beating an unbeaten Tyson or fury beating a 39 year old champion ?
Let's not forget Douglas put on loads of weight and lost his title in his first defence to Holyfield.
Array
Yeah, I know the question is loaded. But...
Douglas was 40/1, Fury was 4/1. But the biggest factor for me is, Tyson (the real one)-Douglas was a terrific fight, bombs were exchanged throughout, Buster was knocked out, then not knocked out, and it ended in a "shock the world" breathtaking KO of the invincible Tyson.
Wlad-Fury was boring as fuck. That's it.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Array
Array
Also, Wlad was seen as on top of his game and very proffesional and the media who visited him in camp were all in awe of how professional and in shape he was. He was also defending in his fortress of Germany under his own promotion.
Mike Tyson on the other hand was going through lots of very public problems and was getting dropped and beaten up by sparring partners in Japan and getting pissed and visiting brothels then having such a shit corner they had to use a condom full of tap water to try and take swelling down!
Basically Mike Tyson was served up on a plate to anyone who was willing to fight back that night.
Mike Tyson was the bigger shock because of how he let himself down. Wladimir Klitschko trying as hard as he can to have everything in his favour got thoroughly outboxed by the better boxer.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks