Who is the best and worst of britains 12 world champions?

[Fenster]

The heavyweight division is utter shit compared with the welterweight one. You wont find a single heavyweight in the world close to any reputable boxing publications P4P list.

[ross]

The heavyweight division is utter shit compared with the welterweight one. You wont find a single heavyweight in the world close to any reputable boxing publications P4P list.

You mean like the Ring who has a financial interest? Publications and the media are mostly made up of no nothings like this forum who are just expressing an opinion which is generally biased. How can people not have Tyson top over the rest of the mediocre champions when he is clearly the best in his division and beat an all time great to do it!

Check the boxrec pound for pound This is based on fact and a points system, not biased opinion.

Oh and Tyson did deserve the fight more than Haye as he fought in 3 eliminators and was mandatory for 2 of the belts! The only reason he didnt have a belt already is because Wlad didnt defend against him sooner! The only reason Tyson didnt have a win over a big name before his totle shot os because Haye pretended to retire rather than lose to Tyson.

The division may not be great but you still have to be very good to not get beaten for so long and he fought more regularly than most of the champs in the lower weights as well.

Compare Wlads schedule to Wards, Mayweathers and Pacquiaos Even Brook himself

Tyson was not only the only man to do it he did it easy

[Fenster]

Boxrec don't have Fury top either. Which must mean they're "biased no nothings like this forum and all the other publications."

However, if you'd like to use Boxrec's P4P, it proves my point about how shit the heavyweight division is compared with welterweight. Boxrec have four welterweights in the top 10. Thanks.

[ross]

Boxrec don't have Fury top either. Which must mean they're "biased no nothings like this forum and all the other publications."

However, if you'd like to use Boxrec's P4P, it proves my point about how shit the heavyweight division is compared with welterweight. Boxrec have four welterweights in the top 10. Thanks.

And all below Fury!!!

[Fenster]

Boxrec don't have Fury top either. Which must mean they're "biased no nothings like this forum and all the other publications."

However, if you'd like to use Boxrec's P4P, it proves my point about how shit the heavyweight division is compared with welterweight. Boxrec have four welterweights in the top 10. Thanks.

And all below Fury!!!

Fury can be no.1 - it still backs up my point that the welterweight division is much stronger than heavyweight. Strength in depth. Your silly rankings prove it.

((Chocolatito isn't in the top 17 ))

[ross]

Boxrec don't have Fury top either. Which must mean they're "biased no nothings like this forum and all the other publications."

However, if you'd like to use Boxrec's P4P, it proves my point about how shit the heavyweight division is compared with welterweight. Boxrec have four welterweights in the top 10. Thanks.

And all below Fury!!!

Fury can be no.1 - it still backs up my point that the welterweight division is much stronger than heavyweight. Strength in depth. Your silly rankings prove it.

((Chocolatito isn't in the top 17 ))

Boxrec isnt mine

[Fenster]

Boxrec don't have Fury top either. Which must mean they're "biased no nothings like this forum and all the other publications."

However, if you'd like to use Boxrec's P4P, it proves my point about how shit the heavyweight division is compared with welterweight. Boxrec have four welterweights in the top 10. Thanks.

And all below Fury!!!

Fury can be no.1 - it still backs up my point that the welterweight division is much stronger than heavyweight. Strength in depth. Your silly rankings prove it.

((Chocolatito isn't in the top 17 ))

Boxrec isnt mine

Those are the rankings you chose to make a point, which has spectacularly backfired against you. The rankings you chose simply proved me correct. If you now wish to distance yourself from them. Fine.

[Silkeyjoe]

Boxrec have the worst points system in the world for ranking fighters too. Absolutely cluesless, its just based on the opinions of the editors.

[ross]

Boxrec have the worst points system in the world for ranking fighters too. Absolutely cluesless, its just based on the opinions of the editors.

Oh really?

"These ratings are not influenced by subjective views or opinions but are wholly dependent upon the bouts contained in the BoxRec database."

BoxRec Ratings Description - BoxRec

[Silkeyjoe]

Boxrec have the worst points system in the world for ranking fighters too. Absolutely cluesless, its just based on the opinions of the editors.

Oh really?

"These ratings are not influenced by subjective views or opinions but are wholly dependent upon the bouts contained in the BoxRec database."

BoxRec Ratings Description - BoxRec

Use there system to work out fighters ratings. They dont add up most of the time.

[ross]

Boxrec have the worst points system in the world for ranking fighters too. Absolutely cluesless, its just based on the opinions of the editors.

Oh really?

"These ratings are not influenced by subjective views or opinions but are wholly dependent upon the bouts contained in the BoxRec database."

BoxRec Ratings Description - BoxRec

Use there system to work out fighters ratings. They dont add up most of the time.

So you think there is a secret agenda among the boxrec editors to make Fury a top P4P fighter and better than all the welter weights?

Or could it be that he had a very good win over a very good fighter?