Eubank/Saunders rematch?

[Silkeyjoe]

I believe Eubank can go one better and win a legitimate title and then will have more leverage over Saunders.

Ironically a bit like when Benn won the WBC title in Italy and negotiated a better deal against his dad.

I don't reckon a Eubank will beat Jacobs IF he ever fights him, and I don't think he fancies his chances either. The only other champs are Saunders, Canelo & GGG.
And anyway , what do you mean by "can go one better and win a legitimate title ?" Isn't Saunders Title legitimate? And if Eubank wins one , why is it "one better?"

Everyone knows WBO is 4th rate title and Eubank could easily beat Canelo and should be able to beat Jacobs once he feels he is ready.

At least WBO don't have Interim, regular and Super Champions! 3 champs in 1 fucking Division!! So is a WBO Champ trump a "regular champ?"
Come on, there all as bad as each other.
So Eubank can beat Canelo easy? And he's not ready for Jacobs, but he'd beat GGG tomorrow according to Pop! Don't believe all the hype you read Master, let your own eyes tell you.
Btw, if the WBO is a 4th rate title, perhaps we shouldn't count British WBO champions! 😏

Yea I would have thought the WBO is one of the best. WBA are a joke and IBF arent any better. WBC are very biased to Mexican fighters.

[Fenster]

Absolutely ridiculous these days to claim one belt is superior to another. However, the WBA are by far the biggest piss takers and have the least credibility.