Re: Roy Jones vs David Haye

Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
Roy Jones, at his peak wasn't near cruiser weight. So this is kind of a trick question.
A peak Roy hardly gets touched by Haye.
Also considering that Roy barely was even touched by faster guys at lower weights, that were harder to see coming, its a little hard for me to believe that the lunging, wide hooking, wide stanced haye is gonna catch him. Also id wager to say roy was more than slightly faster than haye (no offense to Mikeeod). I just think its relativity--its easier for haye to look faster against the crop of heavyweights he's faced (even discounting the 7 ft sloth, valuev) - it doesn't me he would look as fast fighting someone from a lower class whos known for his speed. I wouldn't use ruiz as a measuring stick.
My arguments not based on speed as much as its based on style. With hayes kinetics and wide stance, roy would just be able to see him coming from a mile away. Klitchsko did. If haye refined his style, he'd have less tells... so to speak.
They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.
Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003
Bookmarks