Frampton Quigg scoring.

[Primo Carnera]

there were a couple of rounds quigg didn't through a punch

can that be a 10 - 8?

The way I see it, without knocks downs , for it to be a 10-8 round, you have to be completely dominant and landing some telling blows. That was never the case.
You could also ask if the Work Frampton did in those rounds warranted 10 points?
Can you win rounds by landing 5 or 10 jabs , even if you are busy and hitting arms with the rest?

I personally think that even though Frampton was landing as few punches as quigg in the first six it was Frampton who was trying to land punches and make a fight of it so he deserved the rounds

if quigg had have come out with the same attitude as Frampton then we would have had a fight, instead it was very dull for 6 rounds

think of all the money spend by the public to watch the fight, rounds were scored to the fighter trying to engage, and rightly so

It's a fair comment and I know that most people agree with you. I can accept people giving the rounds 10-9 to Frampton because he had the more positive attitude, but no way 10-8.
I accept Quigg was too negative , but imagine how he felt hearing he's 6 rounds down and he's hardly been hit because everything has been blocked by his gloves. (having said that , he got his jaw broke !)
I acknowledge that Frampton was the deserved winner.

[erics44]

I wanted quigg to win by the way, so there's absolutely no bias in my opinion