Bowe was easy to hit & ate too too much.
He was tremendous in beating Holyfield the first time, but he would never have beaten the '67 Ali.
Ali on points, unanimously.
Bowe was easy to hit & ate too too much.
He was tremendous in beating Holyfield the first time, but he would never have beaten the '67 Ali.
Ali on points, unanimously.
The legend of Drederick Tatum!Hidden Content
I was thinking the same. Like I said before, the only differential that has an impact between eras is his size.
Funnily enough its why I think it would be easier than Foreman. Bowe was quicker than Foreman and would go chasing Ali down. This means Ali wouldn't have to wait for him to tire and Bowe would be easy to find.
Bowe was at his peak 1992 to beat Holyfield and became a fat lazy champ 1993, so Ali should win.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
You mean boweh would not Chase ali down right? Because Foreman was the one chasing ali the down. Bowe didn't really chase people he sort of plodded about I think he would try to land that huge overhand right but alie did not get hit with many rights. The left hook was the tough one and I don't remember boee having a really long left hookt I do remember he have some nice short left hooks inside though
Yeah I agree that Riddick Bowe was deceptively quick. He would not be able to use his very successful inside game on Muhammad because Allie would not lay on his chest like Holyfield did. But would have to fight from the outside and I don't know anybody who can beat Alie from the outside in 1967
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks