Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
Disappointed for Bradley, but credit to Pac , he had a lot more left than I thought he did. Perhaps it puts the difference between Floyd and everyone else into perspective.
I still think Bradley has at least a 50-50 chance against any of the top WW's , dunno what will happen with Pac.
It's wasn't a convincing retirement speech , I hope he doesn't fight Canelo, they should make Canelo fight guys his own size, it's getting ridiculous really. If he fights Crawford, he could grow old overnight, and please , please, no Floyd/Pac 2.
Probably best all round if he did retire.
Bradley is not that good, he is not good as you make out. Proper welterweights like Thurman and Brooks would steam him.

Bradley is content staying on the Top Rank merry go round and will not venture out of that because he is not that great anyway.
Bradley would beat porter and thurman and probably garcia.

Pac done the job x3 times against one of thr best at 147 in the world.

Pac is still strong and can easily have a few more fights as he is still on another level to everyone apart from floyd.
Bradley is not a great welterweight, what good fighter has he beaten at the weight?
Interesting question since you say Thurman is a better welterweight. Are you using double standards intentionally or accidentally?
Thurman is still new to the scene than Bradley and I think beaten better fighters than Tim.
are you joking? Or are you saying only at welterweight? And even then, are you joking? Marquez is better than every fighter Thurman has beaten by a WIDE margin.
I am not joking.

I mean at welterweight.

JMM is not a real welterweight and is even worse than Bradley.