Canelo vs Khan scorecards

[Fenster]

3-2 Canelo was fair enough which two of the judges had it.

Khan didn't lose because his brain went, he was boxing terrific, but Canelo was consistently throwing his right hand to the body waiting to trap him, switched it up stairs and that's all she wrote. Both men deserve credit.

[palmerq]

3-2 Canelo was fair enough which two of the judges had it.

Khan didn't lose because his brain went, he was boxing terrific, but Canelo was consistently throwing his right hand to the body waiting to trap him, switched it up stairs and that's all she wrote. Both men deserve credit.

only one of the judges had canelo at 3-2, the other had it 3-2 for khan and the other rather generous to canelo had it 4-1 for alvarez..

I think 3-2 either way was the correct score. The scorecards really aren't outrageous.

4-1 is pushing it though.

[IamInuit]

3-2 Canelo was fair enough which two of the judges had it.

Khan didn't lose because his brain went, he was boxing terrific, but Canelo was consistently throwing his right hand to the body waiting to trap him, switched it up stairs and that's all she wrote. Both men deserve credit.

only one of the judges had canelo at 3-2, the other had it 3-2 for khan and the other rather generous to canelo had it 4-1 for alvarez..

I think 3-2 either way was the correct score. The scorecards really aren't outrageous.

4-1 is pushing it though.

He won the first 4 on most peoples scorecards across the web. Who cares what the hacks like Byrd and Feldman had. They are two of the worst boxing judges on the planet and Khan mentally fell apart in round 5 and a blind man could see it in real time. Khan was putting on a clinic and Alvarez could barely touch him over the first 4 rounds. Khans the one that folded upstairs at the moment he faced something adverse which is what he always does and we can post the fight right here and I tell you and point out the precise moment when he fell apart.

[palmerq]

3-2 Canelo was fair enough which two of the judges had it.

Khan didn't lose because his brain went, he was boxing terrific, but Canelo was consistently throwing his right hand to the body waiting to trap him, switched it up stairs and that's all she wrote. Both men deserve credit.

only one of the judges had canelo at 3-2, the other had it 3-2 for khan and the other rather generous to canelo had it 4-1 for alvarez..

I think 3-2 either way was the correct score. The scorecards really aren't outrageous.

4-1 is pushing it though.

He won the first 4 on most peoples scorecards across the web. Who cares what the hacks like Byrd and Feldman had. They are two of the worst boxing judges on the planet and Khan mentally fell apart in round 5 and a blind man could see it in real time. Khan was putting on a clinic and Alvarez could barely touch him over the first 4 rounds. Khans the one that folded upstairs at the moment he faced something adverse which is what he always does and we can post the fight right here and I tell you and point out the precise moment when he fell apart.

I am not so sure, it looked to me like a lot of kahns punches were being blocked. Canelo threw more and landed more throughout the fight(according to compubox :S), watching it on the tv I thought canelo was landing more and more powerful too, canelos body shots looked particulary damaging and seemed to take a lot of kahn, canelo was managing to feint him pretty good too and it was a feint that set up the ko punch. I guess it depends how you score fights really and how you compare various things, movement to damage , head to body shots and so on.

also what is so bad about feldmans card that you keep having to name him, he had kahn ahead, I have seen a few people online score it 3-2 various ways, ledermann on the broadcast too.


ops it was adelaide byrd that had kahn ahead my mistake:S

[Fenster]

3-2 Canelo was fair enough which two of the judges had it.

Khan didn't lose because his brain went, he was boxing terrific, but Canelo was consistently throwing his right hand to the body waiting to trap him, switched it up stairs and that's all she wrote. Both men deserve credit.

only one of the judges had canelo at 3-2, the other had it 3-2 for khan and the other rather generous to canelo had it 4-1 for alvarez..

I think 3-2 either way was the correct score. The scorecards really aren't outrageous.

4-1 is pushing it though.

The 4-1 judge gave Canelo the first round which I can't see at all. But looking at their scorecards all the other rounds were fair enough.

I've seen loads of fans/journos/boxers that had it 3-2 Canelo /5-0 Khan /2-3 Khan /4/1 Khan.

Just read Doug Fischer - from The Ring mag - had Khan 5-0 ringside but 3-2 when watching it back.

It will always be impossible to get everyone on the same page when it comes to scoring.