Fury can say whatever he wants, and SO CAN YOU

[Freedom]

Geeh thanks for the genetics lesson. There is only one race scientifically speaking but dont try to twist the facts.

That may well be true. If it is, it proves my point that nothing Fury said is racist.

Look I never mentioned anything about Zionists. I could care less how many born agains are Zionists. That was not the title of the thread you posted here. You might well as used the word kyke.

That's not true. The numerous Jewish people I've known during my life do not consider the word "Jew" to be offensive. They are proud of their heritage and culture. The word "kyke" however is definitely offensive.

If you don't feel its offensive then go join Jim Keegstra in Alberta or Ernst Zundell in Ontario or wherever we deported him to.

That's an overly harsh and unfair comment. I have nothing in common with those guys, I'm just a boxing fan.

That bullshit has no business on the main page of this forum and my advice to you is not doing it again. If you want to paste National inquirer type garbage concerning Jewish people then go start a blog.

Tyson's comments were quoted in articles on the front page of the boxing news websites (The Ring, boxingscene, etc) and mainstream media sports pages (Sky Sports boxing section, the BBC's sports section, etc).

Ban me if you like, but I think you are over-reacting.

[Gandalf]

When it comes to free speech, you have to accept that Fury is entitled to his views. Otherwise you have totalitarianism which is where political correctness is leading to. I don't see the issue really. You had the media in a frenzy over Boris Johnson yesterday and the man is entitled to his views. As is Ken Livingstone. It's a frenzy over nothing.

[brocktonblockbust]

When it comes to free speech, you have to accept that Fury is entitled to his views. Otherwise you have totalitarianism which is where political correctness is leading to. I don't see the issue really. You had the media in a frenzy over Boris Johnson yesterday and the man is entitled to his views. As is Ken Livingstone. It's a frenzy over nothing.

Too late Big T. PC'ness has fucked up the synapses of homo sapiens sucky sucky

[Beanz]

When it comes to free speech, you have to accept that Fury is entitled to his views. Otherwise you have totalitarianism which is where political correctness is leading to. I don't see the issue really. You had the media in a frenzy over Boris Johnson yesterday and the man is entitled to his views. As is Ken Livingstone. It's a frenzy over nothing.

Too late Big T. PC'ness has fucked up the synapses of homo sapiens sucky sucky

Nobody has said he is not entitled to his views. What your good self and Miles along with most of the so called anti-PC brigade are really trying to do though, is censor anybody that disagrees with him. You are not for free speech at all just the right to spout off all kinds of ill founded and derogatory judgmental rubbish without ever having to face the consequences. If you really think that his comments are some kind of enlightening and truthful assessment of the reality of the world we all live in today you are dafter than a brush. We have governments imprisoning, torturing and executing people around the world for criticizing their regimes and media outlets ignoring mass events and publicizing their own agendas and you want to choose an ignorant fool like Tyson Fury or a buffon like Donald Trump as some last bastion of common sense and freedom. Bloody hell you must be bored

[Gandalf]

John Lennon believed in UFO's. Some cosmologists believe that there are parallel universes. Should we ban all points of view until they are systematically proven with no shred of doubt? It's corny. Let people believe what they want. It doesn't hurt me that Walrus believes in God. I like him for it. All this witch hunting over a few loose sentences. 'Ban him!'....Eh? Why? How about arguing why he is wrong and leaving it at that? That is the intolerance I don't have much time for.

[brocktonblockbust]

John Lennon believed in UFO's. Some cosmologists believe that there are parallel universes. Should we ban all points of view until they are systematically proven with no shred of doubt? It's corny. Let people believe what they want. It doesn't hurt me that Walrus believes in God. I like him for it. All this witch hunting over a few loose sentences. 'Ban him!'....Eh? Why? How about arguing why he is wrong and leaving it at that? That is the intolerance I don't have much time for.

Precisely.

[Beanz]

John Lennon believed in UFO's. Some cosmologists believe that there are parallel universes. Should we ban all points of view until they are systematically proven with no shred of doubt? It's corny. Let people believe what they want. It doesn't hurt me that Walrus believes in God. I like him for it. All this witch hunting over a few loose sentences. 'Ban him!'....Eh? Why? How about arguing why he is wrong and leaving it at that? That is the intolerance I don't have much time for.

Precisely.

Precisely what though? Absolutely nobody but you two are talking about banning anybody. Intolerance for anybody who disagrees with your points of view or an eejit like Fury is what it sounds like.