Fury can say whatever he wants, and SO CAN YOU

[brocktonblockbust]

When it comes to free speech, you have to accept that Fury is entitled to his views. Otherwise you have totalitarianism which is where political correctness is leading to. I don't see the issue really. You had the media in a frenzy over Boris Johnson yesterday and the man is entitled to his views. As is Ken Livingstone. It's a frenzy over nothing.

Too late Big T. PC'ness has fucked up the synapses of homo sapiens sucky sucky

[Beanz]

When it comes to free speech, you have to accept that Fury is entitled to his views. Otherwise you have totalitarianism which is where political correctness is leading to. I don't see the issue really. You had the media in a frenzy over Boris Johnson yesterday and the man is entitled to his views. As is Ken Livingstone. It's a frenzy over nothing.

Too late Big T. PC'ness has fucked up the synapses of homo sapiens sucky sucky

Nobody has said he is not entitled to his views. What your good self and Miles along with most of the so called anti-PC brigade are really trying to do though, is censor anybody that disagrees with him. You are not for free speech at all just the right to spout off all kinds of ill founded and derogatory judgmental rubbish without ever having to face the consequences. If you really think that his comments are some kind of enlightening and truthful assessment of the reality of the world we all live in today you are dafter than a brush. We have governments imprisoning, torturing and executing people around the world for criticizing their regimes and media outlets ignoring mass events and publicizing their own agendas and you want to choose an ignorant fool like Tyson Fury or a buffon like Donald Trump as some last bastion of common sense and freedom. Bloody hell you must be bored

[Gandalf]

John Lennon believed in UFO's. Some cosmologists believe that there are parallel universes. Should we ban all points of view until they are systematically proven with no shred of doubt? It's corny. Let people believe what they want. It doesn't hurt me that Walrus believes in God. I like him for it. All this witch hunting over a few loose sentences. 'Ban him!'....Eh? Why? How about arguing why he is wrong and leaving it at that? That is the intolerance I don't have much time for.

[brocktonblockbust]

John Lennon believed in UFO's. Some cosmologists believe that there are parallel universes. Should we ban all points of view until they are systematically proven with no shred of doubt? It's corny. Let people believe what they want. It doesn't hurt me that Walrus believes in God. I like him for it. All this witch hunting over a few loose sentences. 'Ban him!'....Eh? Why? How about arguing why he is wrong and leaving it at that? That is the intolerance I don't have much time for.

Precisely.

[Beanz]

John Lennon believed in UFO's. Some cosmologists believe that there are parallel universes. Should we ban all points of view until they are systematically proven with no shred of doubt? It's corny. Let people believe what they want. It doesn't hurt me that Walrus believes in God. I like him for it. All this witch hunting over a few loose sentences. 'Ban him!'....Eh? Why? How about arguing why he is wrong and leaving it at that? That is the intolerance I don't have much time for.

Precisely.

Precisely what though? Absolutely nobody but you two are talking about banning anybody. Intolerance for anybody who disagrees with your points of view or an eejit like Fury is what it sounds like.

[brocktonblockbust]

John Lennon believed in UFO's. Some cosmologists believe that there are parallel universes. Should we ban all points of view until they are systematically proven with no shred of doubt? It's corny. Let people believe what they want. It doesn't hurt me that Walrus believes in God. I like him for it. All this witch hunting over a few loose sentences. 'Ban him!'....Eh? Why? How about arguing why he is wrong and leaving it at that? That is the intolerance I don't have much time for.

Precisely.

Precisely what though? Absolutely nobody but you two are talking about banning anybody. Intolerance for anybody who disagrees with your points of view or an eejit like Fury is what it sounds like.

Mate its been all over the internet that he may be stripped and banned.

[Memphis]

Are you sure its been all over the internet that he may be banned and stripped, or is it 'should' be banned and stripped?

Again, people can say what they like. I think he should have his bollocks used as a speedball by an angry Ewok. I dont care for or about anything he says, I just think it would be a laugh.

[Beanz]

John Lennon believed in UFO's. Some cosmologists believe that there are parallel universes. Should we ban all points of view until they are systematically proven with no shred of doubt? It's corny. Let people believe what they want. It doesn't hurt me that Walrus believes in God. I like him for it. All this witch hunting over a few loose sentences. 'Ban him!'....Eh? Why? How about arguing why he is wrong and leaving it at that? That is the intolerance I don't have much time for.

Precisely.

Precisely what though? Absolutely nobody but you two are talking about banning anybody. Intolerance for anybody who disagrees with your points of view or an eejit like Fury is what it sounds like.

Mate its been all over the internet that he may be stripped and banned.

It's just the same story being regurgitated like a dog's vomit value meal. The Campaign Against Anti-Antisemitism (whoever they are) have called for him to be banned and the BBOC who could not even stop him fighting in the UK, have said diddly squat.It almost seems like You, Miles and Ross are praying for people to call for him to be banned so that you can make him out to be some kind of victim. Which rather hilariously is just what Tyson casts himself as. The EXACT kind of behaviour you all have posted 1 Billion threads bemoaning all the so-called PC brigade for indulging in.