Scientific Fraud

[TitoFan]

It must be. There's nothing funny about disorders.

[El Kabong]

It must be. There's nothing funny about disorders.

Well enjoy your groupthink

[TitoFan]

[El Kabong]

John Oliver is an obnoxious twat and Bill Nye is last I checked a mechanical engineer who worshiped TV's Mr. Wizard.


Where are the "giant hurricanes" we have been promised and if the sea levels are going to rise then please explain why Al Gore of Vice President to Bill Clinton and 'An Inconvenient Truth' fame would buy a $9 million beachfront mansion....unless of course all the "science" he peddled was bunk?

And if there was truly Global Warming all these years....then
http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/...record-maximum
....how did that happen in 2014?

"Record Maximum"....odd unless it was Global COOLING then MY GOD, WE'RE DOOMED!


Or this....
Global Warming Expedition Stopped In Its Tracks By Arctic Sea Ice | Climate Depot
....yes, how did THAT happen?


So yeah, you can take your "consensus" and cram it! Those motherfuckers still can't figure out El Nino & La Nina cycles much less what the long term effects of.....CO2 is going to do.....I'll take a guess....ummmm plants will breathe it in and then expell oxygen which has happened since there has been life on this fucking planet....comprende?

[TitoFan]

Climate change deniers can be profiled.


Profile of a Climate Denier - New Freethinkers


Here's an interesting excerpt:


Climate Change Denial is Psychological

Many climate change skeptics can present evidence or arguments against anthropogenic climate change. Psychological factors seem to play a huge role in determining who makes those claims and who does not. Social and economic conditions are also influential. Individuals who benefit from the social order use motivated reason to defend it from threats. The argument for climate change raises the risk of costly changes to society, and loss of freedom. People who benefit from that system, mostly white males, seem to feel the need to push back against environmentalists on climate change.

[El Kabong]

Climate change deniers can be profiled.


Profile of a Climate Denier - New Freethinkers


Here's an interesting excerpt:


Climate Change Denial is Psychological

Many climate change skeptics can present evidence or arguments against anthropogenic climate change. Psychological factors seem to play a huge role in determining who makes those claims and who does not. Social and economic conditions are also influential. Individuals who benefit from the social order use motivated reason to defend it from threats. The argument for climate change raises the risk of costly changes to society, and loss of freedom. People who benefit from that system, mostly white males, seem to feel the need to push back against environmentalists on climate change.

....uh huh, does that change the FACT that mother nature produces more CO2 than man?


No?

Shame that

[TitoFan]

Climate change deniers can be profiled.


Profile of a Climate Denier - New Freethinkers


Here's an interesting excerpt:


Climate Change Denial is Psychological

Many climate change skeptics can present evidence or arguments against anthropogenic climate change. Psychological factors seem to play a huge role in determining who makes those claims and who does not. Social and economic conditions are also influential. Individuals who benefit from the social order use motivated reason to defend it from threats. The argument for climate change raises the risk of costly changes to society, and loss of freedom. People who benefit from that system, mostly white males, seem to feel the need to push back against environmentalists on climate change.

....uh huh, does that change the FACT that mother nature produces more CO2 than man?


No?

Shame that

Which in and of itself means nothing toward your argument, if man does produce a significant quantity in the overall scheme of things. But be that as it may, it boils down to the same type of argument we usually have. You again adopt the extremist viewpoint, denying there can ever be ANY effect of man's carelessness on the environment.... while I just open the door to the possibility that we just might be affecting things a little to everyone's detriment... and that we could do better than just dismiss scientific studies as so much gobbledygook.