Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Which in and of itself means nothing toward your argument, if man does produce a significant quantity in the overall scheme of things. But be that as it may, it boils down to the same type of argument we usually have. You again adopt the extremist viewpoint, denying there can ever be ANY effect of man's carelessness on the environment.... while I just open the door to the possibility that we just might be affecting things a little to everyone's detriment... and that we could do better than just dismiss scientific studies as so much gobbledygook.
What SHOULD the climate be right now, what is the 100% best setting for our Earth's "thermostat" if you will?

I mean IF man has caused such a horrible impact on the climate then certainly someone could tell me what the climate would be like sans the impact of mankind and that setting is no doubt the default setting that Climate Alarmists would like to see us at.



I applaud your use of hyperbole "You again adopt the extremist viewpoint, denying there can ever be ANY effect of man's carelessness on the environment".....it makes every discussion with you ever so enjoyable.



I know you prefer equally extremist, opposite viewpoints. It makes your nonsense seem logical in comparison. Unfortunately, when faced with neutrality and common sense, you become frustrated and lash out with your one-line zingers. If you prefer, I can side with the doomsayers and throw in a few global warming chants to get you going.