Re: Which fight is worse?

Originally Posted by
erics44

Originally Posted by
Master

Originally Posted by
erics44

Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera

Originally Posted by
erics44
he won the first, he landed a lot more punches, and solid shots
unless you count a wobble as the automatic loss of a round?
I have to agree with Eric that he had at least a share of other rounds. But I also have to be consistent and say, like I did in the Khan v Canelo fight, it's irrelevant who was winning on points, because it was never going to the cards.
yep very true
but brook GGG was more of a contest than the khan canelo fight
for a couple of rounds at least brook looked like he would make a fight of it
You could argue, on a neutral venue that Khan was winning his fight and won more rounds.
I'm a khan fan and wanted khan to win but I don't think he won anything
It was like man against boy
and I thought kel was landing some solid hurtful shots and won the first two, and he had some success in 3 and 4
Moot point but Khan was in control whereas Brook was surviving from round 3
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Bookmarks