Eubank/Benn vs Roy jones

[Ron Swanson]

Benn survived the G-Man so that means he can beat Jones. The G-Man beat Jones in the AMs is the proof. It's one of the dumbest arguments I've ever seen.

I don't mean to be rude but come the f on with that ignorance.

[Spicoli]

I give Benn a literals punchers chance vs any fighter who has stepped between the ropes. For as much the passion and some recklessness as the power. He wouldn't try to think, posture and work in between Roys reflex which was damn near impossible. Benn v Jones seemed close there for a minute or at least talked up but zero chance promotions would budge. Would have at least been explosive. Also seem to remember Roy hated airports and travel. at least until Jim Lampley stopped yelling.

[mikeeod]

those who have been on this board for a while know that I'm one of Roy's biggest critics when it comes to his quality of opposition and historical ranking. That being said, Roy was special during his prime. Once in a lifetime special.

Eubank and Benn were great fighters, but they weren't once in a lifetime special. 168 lb Roy would feast on aggression. Guys would walk into his left hook or hybrid uppercut and that was the fight (Thomas Tate, Bryant Brannon, Merqui Sosa...etc.). Benn would come to destroy and walk right into something big.

Roy's toughest fights were always with boxers who had solid skills and defense. Think of his fights vs Hop, Montell, and even Eric Harding. Prime Roy would have issues with Eubanks combination of awkward style, speed, reflexes, counter punching ability, and power. That being said, Roy was special and would find a way to win the fight the majority of the time.

While Eubank and Benn were not as great as Roy, they were both legitimate one punch threats, and great fighters, so they definitely belonged in a ring with Roy and could have pulled the upset, if they landed the right punch.

[Spicoli]

those who have been on this board for a while know that I'm one of Roy's biggest critics when it comes to his quality of opposition and historical ranking. That being said, Roy was special during his prime. Once in a lifetime special.

Eubank and Benn were great fighters, but they weren't once in a lifetime special. 168 lb Roy would feast on aggression. Guys would walk into his left hook or hybrid uppercut and that was the fight (Thomas Tate, Bryant Brannon, Merqui Sosa...etc.). Benn would come to destroy and walk right into something big.

Roy's toughest fights were always with boxers who had solid skills and defense. Think of his fights vs Hop, Montell, and even Eric Harding. Prime Roy would have issues with Eubanks combination of awkward style, speed, reflexes, counter punching ability, and power. That being said, Roy was special and would find a way to win the fight the majority of the time.

While Eubank and Benn were not as great as Roy, they were both legitimate one punch threats, and great fighters, so they definitely belonged in a ring with Roy and could have pulled the upset, if they landed the right punch.

Think at 168 Benn was showing a bit more boxing smarts with that attack. Can see exact scenario of Jones timing him and short circuiting him for sure but Benn would be miles above the approach of those three. Sosa and Tate had just been through buzzsaws and Benn was on a completely different level with his own instant eraser of a punch. Right on about Harding, think he may have given Jones better fight than even a Hopkins. Think that effort gets overlooked a bit and how injury and result basically nose dive a quality fighter.

[X]

I loved Nigel Benn and I've met him quite a few times. He would have a puncher's chance against anybody and his early rounds assault was as thrilling an anybody who has stepped in a ring.

Having said that, I was never convinced that he was a true super middleweight. He was nearly always smaller than his opponents at that weight and (for example) Chris Eubank always looked a couple of weight divisions bigger. Nigel did seem to gas out later on in fights too.

its possible that Benn steamrolls Jones, catches him early and totally obliterates him ...... But I think it's much more likely that Jones gets through a couple of uncomfortable rounds and then begins to assert his authority in there, causing the ref to step in to protect a defenceless Benn in or around the ninth round.

Eubank was a totally different proposition. Big, strong, granite chin and will and a really awkward style that was always difficult to look good against. A master at lacing, and stealing rests and an intelligent fighter inside the ropes.

he would never have seen anything like Jones in the ring and would find himself being outsped by someone even more unorthodox than he was!

I pi really can't see Jones stopping Eubank, nor can I see Eubank out boxing Jones. So for me, this is a points decision to Jones after a bit of a messy stinker of a fight.

[Mark TKO]

I'd favour Roy but can see a scenario where both Benn and Eubank could beat him.

I think Roy v Benn would be an edge of your seat thriller

[Primo Carnera]

I'd favour Roy but can see a scenario where both Benn and Eubank could beat win.

I think Roy v Benn would be an edge of your seat thriller

I agree that RJJ v Benn would be a cracker.......... While it lasted. And I should never dismiss Benn after what happened with McLellan. Maybe it's just me, but I'm surprised so many people think these fights would be close. RJJ at his peak whether MW or SMW was an All time great for a period of time . Benn and Eubank, although both very good and both World Champions really weren't at RJJ's level IMO.

[Master]

Benn survived the G-Man so that means he can beat Jones. The G-Man beat Jones in the AMs is the proof. It's one of the dumbest arguments I've ever seen.

I don't mean to be rude but come the f on with that ignorance.

Ross is "reaching" with his argument so much that he has fallen over and fell flat on his face.