Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  19
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: Vitali Klitschko vs. Mike Tyson prime for prime.

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Vitali Klitschko vs. Mike Tyson prime for prime.

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Tyson beat better fighters than Vitali did, it's not even close. Like it or not, Lewis and Byrd were surely his best opponents.
    Tyson best win was a 38 year old Holmes who did not fight for years, Spinks great lhw, Bruno good but lost most big fights and Rudock who came up short in all title fights. I would not say Tyson beat way better guys there better not by much though the 80's was about as bad as it is now. Vitali i think is just a really bad style for Tyson not even saying he is better Vitali just plain bad match up when it comes to the size and style they had.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,315
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Vitali Klitschko vs. Mike Tyson prime for prime.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Tyson beat better fighters than Vitali did, it's not even close. Like it or not, Lewis and Byrd were surely his best opponents.
    Tyson best win was a 38 year old Holmes who did not fight for years, Spinks great lhw, Bruno good but lost most big fights and Rudock who came up short in all title fights. I would not say Tyson beat way better guys there better not by much though the 80's was about as bad as it is now. Vitali i think is just a really bad style for Tyson not even saying he is better Vitali just plain bad match up when it comes to the size and style they had.
    Vitali was slow as Bruno and Tyson never had a problem with robotic fighters. Tyson would hit them with ease and move away before he received anything back.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Vitali Klitschko vs. Mike Tyson prime for prime.

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Tyson beat better fighters than Vitali did, it's not even close. Like it or not, Lewis and Byrd were surely his best opponents.
    Tyson best win was a 38 year old Holmes who did not fight for years, Spinks great lhw, Bruno good but lost most big fights and Rudock who came up short in all title fights. I would not say Tyson beat way better guys there better not by much though the 80's was about as bad as it is now. Vitali i think is just a really bad style for Tyson not even saying he is better Vitali just plain bad match up when it comes to the size and style they had.
    Vitali was slow as Bruno and Tyson never had a problem with robotic fighters. Tyson would hit them with ease and move away before he received anything back.
    Bruno had a shit chin and also did not know what to do when he got hurt also would gas in his fights. Vitali is bigger, steel chin, gas tank for days and better at using his size. Vitali to me has never really had a fight were he was getting outclassed some reason being his opponents and others being because how the fights were stopped when he did lose. I am about 60 percent on the side of Vitali winning not mention he was great at defending his body.

  4. #34
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Vitali Klitschko vs. Mike Tyson prime for prime.

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Vitali was slow as Bruno and Tyson never had a problem with robotic fighters. Tyson would hit them with ease and move away before he received anything back.
    Robotic? He was very awkward but not robotic at all Vitali was very athletic.


    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Bruno had a shit chin and also did not know what to do when he got hurt also would gas in his fights. Vitali is bigger, steel chin, gas tank for days and better at using his size. Vitali to me has never really had a fight were he was getting outclassed some reason being his opponents and others being because how the fights were stopped when he did lose. I am about 60 percent on the side of Vitali winning not mention he was great at defending his body.
    For as big as he was Vitali was surprisingly agile and difficult to hit clean...a few people caught him good (Lewis and Sanders), but he never ended 1 single solitary fight on the canvas.



    I for the life of me have a very difficult time imagining these guys fighting. Their size difference, their style difference, it's just night and day.....it would be like Jack Johnson vs Floyd Patterson, just not really a pairing I would have ever imagined.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    955
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Vitali Klitschko vs. Mike Tyson prime for prime.

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Tyson beat better fighters than Vitali did, it's not even close. Like it or not, Lewis and Byrd were surely his best opponents.
    Tyson best win was a 38 year old Holmes who did not fight for years, Spinks great lhw, Bruno good but lost most big fights and Rudock who came up short in all title fights. I would not say Tyson beat way better guys there better not by much though the 80's was about as bad as it is now. Vitali i think is just a really bad style for Tyson not even saying he is better Vitali just plain bad match up when it comes to the size and style they had.
    Vitali was slow as Bruno and Tyson never had a problem with robotic fighters. Tyson would hit them with ease and move away before he received anything back.
    Bruno was lightning you dick
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,315
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Vitali Klitschko vs. Mike Tyson prime for prime.

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Tyson beat better fighters than Vitali did, it's not even close. Like it or not, Lewis and Byrd were surely his best opponents.
    Tyson best win was a 38 year old Holmes who did not fight for years, Spinks great lhw, Bruno good but lost most big fights and Rudock who came up short in all title fights. I would not say Tyson beat way better guys there better not by much though the 80's was about as bad as it is now. Vitali i think is just a really bad style for Tyson not even saying he is better Vitali just plain bad match up when it comes to the size and style they had.
    Vitali was slow as Bruno and Tyson never had a problem with robotic fighters. Tyson would hit them with ease and move away before he received anything back.
    Bruno was lightning you dick
    If he was then Tyson was even faster.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,783
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2028
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Vitali Klitschko vs. Mike Tyson prime for prime.

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Tyson beat better fighters than Vitali did, it's not even close. Like it or not, Lewis and Byrd were surely his best opponents.
    Tyson best win was a 38 year old Holmes who did not fight for years, Spinks great lhw, Bruno good but lost most big fights and Rudock who came up short in all title fights. I would not say Tyson beat way better guys there better not by much though the 80's was about as bad as it is now. Vitali i think is just a really bad style for Tyson not even saying he is better Vitali just plain bad match up when it comes to the size and style they had.
    Vitali was slow as Bruno and Tyson never had a problem with robotic fighters. Tyson would hit them with ease and move away before he received anything back.
    Bruno was lightning you dick
    If he was then Tyson was even faster.



    You're becoming too kind in your old age.


    Having someone claim Bruno was lightning is the sports equivalent of a lollypop pitch right down the middle of the plate, begging to be hammered over the center field wall.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1336
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Vitali Klitschko vs. Mike Tyson prime for prime.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Tyson beat better fighters than Vitali did, it's not even close. Like it or not, Lewis and Byrd were surely his best opponents.
    Tyson best win was a 38 year old Holmes who did not fight for years, Spinks great lhw, Bruno good but lost most big fights and Rudock who came up short in all title fights. I would not say Tyson beat way better guys there better not by much though the 80's was about as bad as it is now. Vitali i think is just a really bad style for Tyson not even saying he is better Vitali just plain bad match up when it comes to the size and style they had.
    If you do that with Vitali's best wins it makes him look considerably worse. Either guy could have won and we have no measuring stick, all I was saying.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    955
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Vitali Klitschko vs. Mike Tyson prime for prime.

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Tyson beat better fighters than Vitali did, it's not even close. Like it or not, Lewis and Byrd were surely his best opponents.
    Tyson best win was a 38 year old Holmes who did not fight for years, Spinks great lhw, Bruno good but lost most big fights and Rudock who came up short in all title fights. I would not say Tyson beat way better guys there better not by much though the 80's was about as bad as it is now. Vitali i think is just a really bad style for Tyson not even saying he is better Vitali just plain bad match up when it comes to the size and style they had.
    Vitali was slow as Bruno and Tyson never had a problem with robotic fighters. Tyson would hit them with ease and move away before he received anything back.
    Bruno was lightning you dick
    If he was then Tyson was even faster.
    Tyson was fast
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,373
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    763
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Tyson beat better fighters than Vitali did, it's not even close. Like it or not, Lewis and Byrd were surely his best opponents.
    Tyson best win was a 38 year old Holmes who did not fight for years, Spinks great lhw, Bruno good but lost most big fights and Rudock who came up short in all title fights. I would not say Tyson beat way better guys there better not by much though the 80's was about as bad as it is now. Vitali i think is just a really bad style for Tyson not even saying he is better Vitali just plain bad match up when it comes to the size and style they had.
    Vitali was slow as Bruno and Tyson never had a problem with robotic fighters. Tyson would hit them with ease and move away before he received anything back.
    Bruno was lightning you dick
    If he was then Tyson was even faster.
    Tyson was fast
    Is that you posting, or Paul Kevin? 😂

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Prime Leon Spinks vs Prime Vitali Klitschko
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-05-2015, 02:21 PM
  2. Prime Mike Tyson VS Prime Vitali Klitschko...Winner?
    By LUCKY_13 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 121
    Last Post: 11-08-2013, 11:05 PM
  3. Prime David Tua vs prime Mike Tyson who wins ?
    By USA LOVES THE KLITSCHKOS in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 04-06-2009, 06:55 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-07-2007, 04:26 PM
  5. Replies: 105
    Last Post: 11-17-2006, 06:34 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing