Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  8
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    802
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Are you mad?

    That fight was one way traffic and the guy was looking for a way out of the fight. It would have been an in justice if they disqualified him just like Roy Jones first loss. It was wrong.

    2 fighters with records 15-15-10 and that's a DQ.

    Rules are rules and he broke the rules. He hit a guy who was down and the ref knew it because he initially waved his hands saying no KD and once he noticed the guy was staying down he started counting.

    Ref protected Parkers record, he bottled it.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,067
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1815
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Post a vid. I thought you were only posting in vids from now on? You're such a quitter.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    802
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Post a vid. I thought you were only posting in vids from now on? You're such a quitter.
    @Memphis haha, I'm sitting in work. Have not gave up on the video format.



    Master even if Dimitrenko wasn't injured and he was acting, it's an illegal shot.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,326
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3108
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    It would send a dangerous precedent if they disqualified every time someone hit them when they are down. Every tom, dick and harry would roll around claiming injury. It was the right decision and let us move on to something more important like Chisora throwing a table at Whytes head.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    802
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    It would send a dangerous precedent if they disqualified every time someone hit them when they are down. Every tom, dick and harry would roll around claiming injury. It was the right decision and let us move on to something more important like Chisora throwing a table at Whytes head.
    Funny that if someone likes a fighter it's fine.

    If you're fav fighter got beaten by that punch it'd be illegal then wouldn't it?
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,326
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3108
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    It would send a dangerous precedent if they disqualified every time someone hit them when they are down. Every tom, dick and harry would roll around claiming injury. It was the right decision and let us move on to something more important like Chisora throwing a table at Whytes head.
    Funny that if someone likes a fighter it's fine.

    If you're fav fighter got beaten by that punch it'd be illegal then wouldn't it?
    I honestly never seen Parker fight before but I was appalled by the lack of effort by his opponent. No way that cunt deserves the fight by disqualification.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    956
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,326
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3108
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    The opponent was a joke and surprised he was even rated that high. He did not even try. Forget rules and use your common sense. It would have been a travesty if they disqualified Parker. The man was faking the injury and he should be a actor not a boxer.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Good one punch Ko from Joseph Parker
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-09-2014, 01:11 AM
  2. Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-24-2011, 04:32 PM
  3. I know the answer sounds obvious but.........
    By leftylee in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 11-27-2007, 02:55 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-29-2006, 07:30 PM
  5. Isn't obvious why hatton's workrate dropped....
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-15-2006, 02:44 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing