Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  8
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,317
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    It would send a dangerous precedent if they disqualified every time someone hit them when they are down. Every tom, dick and harry would roll around claiming injury. It was the right decision and let us move on to something more important like Chisora throwing a table at Whytes head.
    Funny that if someone likes a fighter it's fine.

    If you're fav fighter got beaten by that punch it'd be illegal then wouldn't it?
    I honestly never seen Parker fight before but I was appalled by the lack of effort by his opponent. No way that cunt deserves the fight by disqualification.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    955
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,317
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Even eric44 is talking sense now.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    802
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Even eric44 is talking sense now.
    I don't dispute that there was only one winner.. it just find it funny how fans bend their opinions based on the fighter and how a fights going.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,317
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Even eric44 is talking sense now.
    I don't dispute that there was only one winner.. it just find it funny how fans bend their opinions based on the fighter and how a fights going.
    Probably more on how the fight is going.

    Terry Norris, one of my favourite fighter was disqualified twice against the same person (also faking) and I was more annoyed at Terry for making the mistake.

    Roy Jones should never have been disqualified.

    Arthur Abrahams not so sure
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    650
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
    Should AJ have been DQ's?

  7. #7
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch



    Dimitrenko wasn't winning but come on, that's a cheap one right there.......arm up, ribs exposed, that'll put anyone down

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    802
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
    Should AJ have been DQ's?
    @Batman
    If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Good one punch Ko from Joseph Parker
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-09-2014, 01:11 AM
  2. Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-24-2011, 04:32 PM
  3. I know the answer sounds obvious but.........
    By leftylee in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 11-27-2007, 02:55 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-29-2006, 07:30 PM
  5. Isn't obvious why hatton's workrate dropped....
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-15-2006, 02:44 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing