So..... Brook-Khan will never happen then?

[Mark TKO]

Wouldn't you love contracts where the purse split hinged on the result

[El Kabong]

Wouldn't you love contracts where the purse split hinged on the result

It would be nice, start out with a 30-30 leave 40% up for grabs if it's a draw then 50-50 if it's a decision 60-40 and if it's a KO 70-30....wouldn't be horrible to test that out especially with undercard bouts first.

[Master]

Wouldn't you love contracts where the purse split hinged on the result

It would be nice, start out with a 30-30 leave 40% up for grabs if it's a draw then 50-50 if it's a decision 60-40 and if it's a KO 70-30....wouldn't be horrible to test that out especially with undercard bouts first.

Ultimate payment by results.

[Kirkland Laing]

70-30 is taking the piss even as a starting point for negotiations. If he's not moving off 70% then he doesn't really want the fight.

[Ron Swanson]

Just take their pay for the last 4 fights, add it up, divide one by the other and you know what percentages either deserves. If it is 70/30, f it, 70/30. If it is some other number fight for that. Just end the charade and fight so nobody has to listen to either wanker anymore. Fighters talk too f'n much these days

[Batman]

Wouldn't you love contracts where the purse split hinged on the result

It would be nice, start out with a 30-30 leave 40% up for grabs if it's a draw then 50-50 if it's a decision 60-40 and if it's a KO 70-30....wouldn't be horrible to test that out especially with undercard bouts first.

Great idea, only problem is you get so many dodgy decisions that it'd never work out, one boxer clearly wins the fight, the home judges give it the other way, not only does the (flase) winner keep his 0 but he also gets the lions share of the money

there is too much scrutiny on judges from fans for that idea to ever work, in a perfect world then yeah definitely it would be great.

[El Kabong]

Wouldn't you love contracts where the purse split hinged on the result

It would be nice, start out with a 30-30 leave 40% up for grabs if it's a draw then 50-50 if it's a decision 60-40 and if it's a KO 70-30....wouldn't be horrible to test that out especially with undercard bouts first.

Great idea, only problem is you get so many dodgy decisions that it'd never work out, one boxer clearly wins the fight, the home judges give it the other way, not only does the (flase) winner keep his 0 but he also gets the lions share of the money

there is too much scrutiny on judges from fans for that idea to ever work, in a perfect world then yeah definitely it would be great.

Perhaps the crowd would more accurately judge the fight? IDK something outrageous like that might need to happen in boxing

[Batman]

Wouldn't you love contracts where the purse split hinged on the result

It would be nice, start out with a 30-30 leave 40% up for grabs if it's a draw then 50-50 if it's a decision 60-40 and if it's a KO 70-30....wouldn't be horrible to test that out especially with undercard bouts first.

Great idea, only problem is you get so many dodgy decisions that it'd never work out, one boxer clearly wins the fight, the home judges give it the other way, not only does the (flase) winner keep his 0 but he also gets the lions share of the money

there is too much scrutiny on judges from fans for that idea to ever work, in a perfect world then yeah definitely it would be great.

Perhaps the crowd would more accurately judge the fight? IDK something outrageous like that might need to happen in boxing

so what you are saying is that the fighter with the biggest fan base who sells the most tickets wins every time?

I could just see Eubank Jr on Twitter now, ''whoever buys tickets and votes for me gets 10% off my next PPV event which is being broadcast exclusively on BBC radio 4''

[El Kabong]

so what you are saying is that the fighter with the biggest fan base who sells the most tickets wins every time?

I could just see Eubank Jr on Twitter now, ''whoever buys tickets and votes for me gets 10% off my next PPV event which is being broadcast exclusively on BBC radio 4''

That's worse than crooked judges?

[Batman]

so what you are saying is that the fighter with the biggest fan base who sells the most tickets wins every time?

I could just see Eubank Jr on Twitter now, ''whoever buys tickets and votes for me gets 10% off my next PPV event which is being broadcast exclusively on BBC radio 4''

That's worse than crooked judges?

Far from it but its still far from ideal

[smashup]

Wouldn't you love contracts where the purse split hinged on the result

That's exactly what Brook has done (more or less) offering Khan a 70-30 purse to the winner Very clever move by Brook/Hearn and Khan is now firmly backed into a corner and will look an absolute wanker if he doesn't agree to it.

"Put your money where your mouth is" indeed

Kell Brook sends fight ultimatum to Amir Khan after money spat | GiveMeSport

[El Kabong]

This is yet another "BAD RIVALRY"


Kell and Amir hate each other, I mean DESPISE each other! They are going to attempt to humiliate each other in the ring!



The purse is what? Nah, nah that ain't happening.





Don't give me fake hatin' Amir Khan! I want the REAL bleeding from the eyes urge to kill hatred....at least before the fight, but I guess we will just have to accept the fact that Amir just doesn't have the sack for this fight.