So here is the real deal with Trump's actions and decisions

[Gandalf]

Yes, and I do not support open borders. Your point being what exactly? I still don't get it.

Countries are wary of Syrian refugees and I have said why over the years. That's why you don't interfere in the region.

[walrus]

Yes, and I do not support open borders. Your point being what exactly? I still don't get it.

Countries are wary of Syrian refugees and I have said why over the years. That's why you don't interfere in the region.

You want all sides of the discussion u r schizophrenic

[Gandalf]

Yes, and I do not support open borders. Your point being what exactly? I still don't get it.

Countries are wary of Syrian refugees and I have said why over the years. That's why you don't interfere in the region.

You want all sides of the discussion u r schizophrenic

Nope. I said disrupting the lives of anyone with a visa or residency is a folly. Such people have already done what was expected of them.

Otherwise, I am pro sensible immigration meaning not in favor of open borders like in Germany. Nothing maladjusted about such a position in the slightest.

[walrus]

Yes, and I do not support open borders. Your point being what exactly? I still don't get it.

Countries are wary of Syrian refugees and I have said why over the years. That's why you don't interfere in the region.

You want all sides of the discussion u r schizophrenic

Nope. I said disrupting the lives of anyone with a visa or residency is a folly. Such people have already done what was expected of them.

Otherwise, I am pro sensible immigration meaning not in favor of open borders like in Germany. Nothing maladjusted about such a position in the slightest.

You r a dog chasing its tail three miles South Korea took 3 Syrian refugees since 1994

[Gandalf]

Yes, and I do not support open borders. Your point being what exactly? I still don't get it.

Countries are wary of Syrian refugees and I have said why over the years. That's why you don't interfere in the region.

You want all sides of the discussion u r schizophrenic

Nope. I said disrupting the lives of anyone with a visa or residency is a folly. Such people have already done what was expected of them.

Otherwise, I am pro sensible immigration meaning not in favor of open borders like in Germany. Nothing maladjusted about such a position in the slightest.

You r a dog chasing its tail three miles South Korea took 3 Syrian refugees since 1994

Why are they obliged to get involved in a conflict where they have not meddled?

That's what I don't understand. How can you not see that invading, arming rebels and bombing is only going to lead to chaos?

That's the big difference. Your country has helped decimate Libya, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. It's becoming quite the list and still you have people like Vidgil going 'We are the good guys!'. That is the schizophrenia. That and Brock suddenly becoming a neo con. Most countries stayed well away and sensibly so.

Then you want to have a go at countries that don't go to war or get involved? Strange folk.

[brocktonblockbust]

no you are the strange one man

[Gandalf]

You and Walrus are clearly drinking too much of the tap water. Uncontrolled borders are wrong, but denying green card holders who have done all the right things is also wrong. As usual you have your fingers in your ears and are unwilling to ever accept that Trump has perhaps not handled this very well. Muppet.

[brocktonblockbust]

Miles, Trump was against the Iraq war, he is not a politician, he took no money from anyone! No one owns him, he owes nobody anything, he defeated the entire George Soros mainstream media libtard nonsense everything was stacked against him even a lot of his own Republican party for the past one year now. He pulled off the most miraculous victory of all time in the face oven entirely stacked the deck against him. How dare you or anybody else now tried to put him in the same position of other she'll garbage as George Bush and Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Are you out of your mind man? This guy is doing stuff for the people.

[walrus]

Yes, and I do not support open borders. Your point being what exactly? I still don't get it.

Countries are wary of Syrian refugees and I have said why over the years. That's why you don't interfere in the region.

You want all sides of the discussion u r schizophrenic

Nope. I said disrupting the lives of anyone with a visa or residency is a folly. Such people have already done what was expected of them.

Otherwise, I am pro sensible immigration meaning not in favor of open borders like in Germany. Nothing maladjusted about such a position in the slightest.

You r a dog chasing its tail three miles South Korea took 3 Syrian refugees since 1994

Why are they obliged to get involved in a conflict where they have not meddled?

That's what I don't understand. How can you not see that invading, arming rebels and bombing is only going to lead to chaos?

That's the big difference. Your country has helped decimate Libya, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. It's becoming quite the list and still you have people like Vidgil going 'We are the good guys!'. That is the schizophrenia. That and Brock suddenly becoming a neo con. Most countries stayed well away and sensibly so.

Then you want to have a go at countries that don't go to war or get involved? Strange folk.

Miles South Korea took 3 Syrians since 1994

[walrus]

Since u were white and educated they let u in. Does something seem wrong

[brocktonblockbust]

Miles and a few other Brits need to study SYLLOGISTIC REASONING.

[denilson200]

Trump is not gonna kill his way out of this.

I think Steve Bannon (The man who has Trump's ear) deliberately wants to incite the Clash of Civilizations war.

He is literally Bond-supervillain insane.

He just needs a white Persian cat and a monocle to complete the look.

Look at him



That's the face of white supremacy. Ugly wart faced, too much red meat eating bastard.

He looks like he eats, drinks, and bathes in lard. If he bathes at all, which is up for question.

Any bans or attacks on Muslims from him will be twisted around in a “See! America hates you because you’re Muslim! Join us in our jihad against the infidels!” type fashion.

Given ISIS’ effectiveness at recruiting new members over the internet, they will be able to radicalize at least some local Muslims in the U.S. that have already been leaning in that direction.

And there will be increased attacks by these people. Americans will die at their hands. Trump has just created more terrorists, and some of themare already on U.S. soil. And, were it not for the previous administrations long thought out moves to build the coalition fighting ISIS at the root, they would swell their ranks overseas easily.

I’m not sure they’ll be able to do that very effectively now given the coordinated efforts to stop them, but that’s no thanks to Drumpf. He’s a world class idiot.

I actually think that all that needs to happen is that these countries build a temple, or rename an existing temple after Trump and then pay the Trump organization suitable monetary tribute.

I am relatively certain that after they do this the ban would be lifted.

[TitoFan]

Bannon looks like Philip Seymour Hoffman, R.I.P.

[brocktonblockbust]

The revolution has just begun. It is dizzying to see all these special interests get ***whacked*** by trump daily.