Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Hold up a minute... Enzo is a "worthy, multi-defence champion" and Bellew is a "made-up, unproven champion?"

Enzo was HANDED the WBO title vacated by Johnny Nelson, he didn't win it in the ring. He then defended it against Mark Hobson, a previous British level victim of his, before facing Bobby 'the bare knuckle gypo' Gunn (Enzo was as short as 4/1 to win in the 1st round, which thankfully he duly did. Kerching!) and scored his best win over Wayne Braithwaite (who many argued was "shot"). He then had another gimme against a no-mark before getting mullered by Haye. And that was his "worthy championship reign."

Bellew pulled off a big upset to win the vacant WBC title sparking Ilunga Makabu. He also has wins over Masternak, Cleverly (yeah, I know he's not a cruiser but proven world-class) the commentator and Brudov among some other no-mark wins.

Lets keep it fair.
Yes, Enzo is a multi defence Champion - FACT as you would say. 5 defences , opponents with combined career records of 124-13-4. Bellew is an unproven champ , who got his chance after fighting non CW's (Cleverley & others where he came in half a stone below the limit.) and has defended it once against a hand picked part time commentator - FACT.