That tells you everything you need to know about the WBC.

They themselves rate Evander Holyfield as the best ever cruiserweight champion they have had. That's the same Evander Holyfield who held their title for a year and never even defended it as far as I'm aware.

Thats hugely disrespectful to their other cruiserweight champions.

On what criteria did they make this judgement? The only possible answer is they decided he was their best cruiserweight because of his achievements with OTHER governing bodies .... yet they refuse to rank fighters rated by the other bodies.

Hypocrisy? Surely not