You folks got a little off topic. I'm not judging Brooke harshly or in any way suggesting it has any effect on what happens now.

The question was very straight forward, about his management. I don't understand it. To my knowledge(not much on this other than what I have heard which could easily be wrong) Kell had an extensive amateur resume. Certainly enough to not be facing guys with 80, 90, 100 losses 2/3 years into his pro career and guys with losing records into his 4th pro year.

I think my way of thinking is a bit misunderstood. When I think someone is good I have higher expectations of them. I think this might look like hating online. But if you only see the words that are there.....