Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
You folks got a little off topic. I'm not judging Brooke harshly or in any way suggesting it has any effect on what happens now.

The question was very straight forward, about his management. I don't understand it. To my knowledge(not much on this other than what I have heard which could easily be wrong) Kell had an extensive amateur resume. Certainly enough to not be facing guys with 80, 90, 100 losses 2/3 years into his pro career and guys with losing records into his 4th pro year.

I think my way of thinking is a bit misunderstood. When I think someone is good I have higher expectations of them. I think this might look like hating online. But if you only see the words that are there.....
There is a proven model/philosophy of bringing fighters, even fighters with extensive amateur careers, along very slowly to transition effectively and make them a well rounded pro. Look at Roy, who was one of the greatest amateurs the US has had. His father brought him along very slowly, to the point that boxing writers and pundits were constantly pointing it out and complaining. Roy Sr. would tell them that it was his job to build his son into a champ who would last a long time, not rush Roy and make all of his money in the first few years.

Some great amateurs, like Oscar, Ray Leonard, and Loma, are able to transition quickly and take on tough competition relatively early in their careers. Others are rushed to make money and quickly find out their amateur experience didn't translate to the pros and their confidence is shattered.