Vasyl Lomachenko is P4P #1

[TitoFan]

No it does not help, you are in the wrong but will not admit that Brook was nothing compared to real middleweights he has faced.

Only an imbecile (looks like name-calling to me, but I could be wrong) could possibly think i'm wrong about this particular subject. I am the first person to admit i'm wrong when provided with evidence.

The only place i'm wrong is in your sawdust filled cranium (oops... not technically name-calling, but could be interpreted as an insult, I guess).

In fact, I'll start a new thread, as this is about P4P.

You are the one getting upset and name calling. Not me.

I have no doubt the opponents that GGG beat would have beaten Brook at middleweight. There is a reason why Brook fights at welterweight because he is not a middleweight to begin with and he would not be half as successful. Brook got an opportunity and he tried but he could never live up to the middleweights if he campaigned there.

You are the one getting upset and name calling. Not me.

I have no doubt the opponents that GGG beat would have beaten Brook at middleweight. There is a reason why Brook fights at welterweight because he is not a middleweight to begin with and he would not be half as successful. Brook got an opportunity and he tried but he could never live up to the middleweights if he campaigned there.

Yeah you've already said that. Did I ever say your opinion is wrong? No. When you claimed Brook did better because "Golovkin let him" I said - "fair enough," I didn't even dispute it regardless of how pathetic an answer it is.

However, If you claim to have "relevant facts" then you have to produce them when challenged. Your opinion doesn't count as a relevant fact.

(I never resort to name calling, I am totally consistent in pointing out idiotic statements/opinions) Gee I could be wrong on this one again...
but "imbecile" is kind of a name... ain't it?

Meanwhile, my own statement about Brook not being like any of the other fighters he mentioned in that Brook leaped up to MW from Welter... got knocked out... and went right back down to Welter... those statements went totally ignored, and then labeled as "not having anything to do with what Fenster had written".

Must be tough getting owned in an argument.

[Fenster]

No it does not help, you are in the wrong but will not admit that Brook was nothing compared to real middleweights he has faced.

Only an imbecile (looks like name-calling to me, but I could be wrong) could possibly think i'm wrong about this particular subject. I am the first person to admit i'm wrong when provided with evidence.

The only place i'm wrong is in your sawdust filled cranium (oops... not technically name-calling, but could be interpreted as an insult, I guess).

In fact, I'll start a new thread, as this is about P4P.

You are the one getting upset and name calling. Not me.

I have no doubt the opponents that GGG beat would have beaten Brook at middleweight. There is a reason why Brook fights at welterweight because he is not a middleweight to begin with and he would not be half as successful. Brook got an opportunity and he tried but he could never live up to the middleweights if he campaigned there.

You are the one getting upset and name calling. Not me.

I have no doubt the opponents that GGG beat would have beaten Brook at middleweight. There is a reason why Brook fights at welterweight because he is not a middleweight to begin with and he would not be half as successful. Brook got an opportunity and he tried but he could never live up to the middleweights if he campaigned there.

Yeah you've already said that. Did I ever say your opinion is wrong? No. When you claimed Brook did better because "Golovkin let him" I said - "fair enough," I didn't even dispute it regardless of how pathetic an answer it is.

However, If you claim to have "relevant facts" then you have to produce them when challenged. Your opinion doesn't count as a relevant fact.

(I never resort to name calling, I am totally consistent in pointing out idiotic statements/opinions) Gee I could be wrong on this one again...
but "imbecile" is kind of a name... ain't it?

Meanwhile, my own statement about Brook not being like any of the other fighters he mentioned in that Brook leaped up to MW from Welter... got knocked out... and went right back down to Welter... those statements went totally ignored, and then labeled as "not having anything to do with what Fenster had written".

Must be tough getting owned in an argument.

Well you've just proved the imbecile remarks were apt, well put in fact, if I must say so myself.

[TitoFan]

Nothing much left to be said here. I believe I made my point, just like you made yours.