
Originally Posted by
Master
You are the one getting upset and name calling. Not me.
I have no doubt the opponents that GGG beat would have beaten Brook at middleweight. There is a reason why Brook fights at welterweight because he is not a middleweight to begin with and he would not be half as successful. Brook got an opportunity and he tried but he could never live up to the middleweights if he campaigned there.
Yeah you've already said that. Did I ever say your
opinion is wrong? No. When you claimed Brook did better because "Golovkin let him" I said - "fair enough," I didn't even dispute it regardless of how pathetic an answer it is.
However, If you claim to have "relevant facts" then you have to produce them when challenged. Your
opinion doesn't count as a relevant fact.
(I never resort to name calling, I am totally consistent in pointing out idiotic statements/opinions)
Gee I could be wrong on this one again...
but "imbecile" is kind of a name... ain't it?
Bookmarks