His record says yes. Will always be judged against the era he fought in - not his fault.
Top twenty yes for me. Ten no
His record says yes. Will always be judged against the era he fought in - not his fault.
Top twenty yes for me. Ten no
Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate
I say yes he is although I think Bowe and Vitali would beat him but his record of consistancy and defences puts him above them. I have him ahead of Dempsey, Tunney, Rocky and old guard Sullivan, Corbett and Jim Jeffries.
Ali
Louis
Holmes
Jack Johnson
Tyson
Lennox
Foreman
Frazier
Holyfield
Wlad
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
No, people are high on an old dog putting in a gutsy end of career showing, but where was this Wlad over a decade of jab and clinch? Wlad has had a great career but has folded all too often when not allowed to jab and clinch. Mark is right, a solid top 20 based on technical skills, but always a punch away from being knocked down or stopped. Vitali was the ior fighter. Chin, output and intelligence. Wlad was always missing a few of those attributes.
Superior...pesky phone....
There are many reasons that he is not, but one of the biggest is that he wasn't the best HW in the world for most of his reign. Vitali was better but they obviously wouldn't fight each other. Just imagine an alternative reality where they fought and vitali KOd him. Would that change your opinion of his status?
If that happened then I would give him a ton more respect. I just don't see it happening. I think that vitali was the better fighter between the two. He just doesn't have the accolades that his brother has.
Your argument doesn't hold up though. Let's say for example that Ali and Frazier never fought. They just avoided each other and both claimed to be the best. Wouldn't both of their statuses have gone down significantly? This fights made them who they were.
Wlad and vitali we're the obvious two best fighters for a while. If they don't fight each other, you have to dock them for avoiding the most dangerous opponent out there even if there was a good reason. I mean seriously, vitali would have been hands down the best fighter that wlad had ever fought. If he could have beaten him, then I would have said that he was the real deal. Since they didn't fight, I can only go off of what I perceive which was that wlad would have gotten beat and basically got a free pass to avoid the actual best HW fighter at the time.
Yeah.....soooo in the long and storied history of boxing when have brothers fought each other?
Max Baer vs Buddy Baer? That ever happen?
Jerry vs Mike vs Bobby in a Quarry Brothers Battle Royal? That ever go down?
Floyd Sr ever fight Roger or Jeff Mayweather?
Leon and Michael Spinks ever fight each other? That ever happen?
Just provide ANY precedent for that fight to happen and I'll agree with you otherwise it's a big old nothing burger
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks