Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
Brook is better than Thurman IMO.
Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
I second that Brook is a better boxer than Thurman.
You what take Porter away from Kell's record and what's he done?
Not to mention he quit in back to back fights in his own backyard!
Thurman has beaten better and so far he's not lost (let alone quit)

Brook probably wouldn't even beat Khan let alone Thurman
In 13 years and after 38 fights, Brook has one good win on his record
Thurman has had 10 less fights and has already beaten better and done more.

Kell Brook is shit! I know there's a lot of Brits posting on here
But come on guys let's be honest. Kell has fallen far short at elite level.
Brook beat Porter better than Thurman did. Calling him sh-t is ridiculous.
One night and one fight doesn't mean much
Especially when you've quit twice in a row
Brook might not be shit but he's nothing special