
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
Brook is better than Thurman IMO.

Originally Posted by
Hulk
I second that Brook is a better boxer than Thurman.
You what

take Porter away from Kell's record and what's he done?
Not to mention he quit in back to back fights in his own backyard!
Thurman has beaten better and so far he's not lost (let alone quit)
Brook probably wouldn't even beat Khan let alone Thurman
In 13 years and after 38 fights, Brook has one good win on his record
Thurman has had 10 less fights and has already beaten better and done more.
Kell Brook is shit! I know there's a lot of Brits posting on here
But come on guys let's be honest. Kell has fallen far short at elite level.
Bookmarks