Can GGG get any better?

[Master]

Jabs score points and landing more jabs counts more than landing one big punch.

[GaMo]

Jabs score points and landing more jabs counts more than landing one big punch.

That's your opinion and as per usual it's wrong

Everyone is crying about the 118-110 scorecard
But nobody has had anything to say about the 114-114 card
Which suggests that most people think a draw was fair.

[Master]

Jabs score points and landing more jabs counts more than landing one big punch.

That's your opinion and as per usual it's wrong

Everyone is crying about the 118-110 scorecard
But nobody has had anything to say about the 114-114 card
Which suggests that most people think a draw was fair.

You do not read.

Everyone with any sense says the fight was close. So to have a draw is a fair opinion to have.

[GaMo]

Jabs score points and landing more jabs counts more than landing one big punch.

That's your opinion and as per usual it's wrong

Everyone is crying about the 118-110 scorecard
But nobody has had anything to say about the 114-114 card
Which suggests that most people think a draw was fair.

You do not read.

Everyone with any sense says the fight was close. So to have a draw is a fair opinion to have.

So if the draw is a fair opinion then what's everyone crying about? The fight was scored a draw so the guy with the drawn scorecard is the person who got it right (it matched the result)

[Master]

Because if the corrupt or incompetent judge had scored it correctly GGG would have won.

What is not to understand?

[GaMo]

Because if the corrupt or incompetent judge had scored it correctly GGG would have won.

What is not to understand?

They scored it how they saw it. Just because their scores didn't match yours doesn't make them wrong

[Primo Carnera]

Because if the corrupt or incompetent judge had scored it correctly GGG would have won.

What is not to understand?

Ok. I believe what @GaMo is saying is if Byrd had judged it to Canelo by 1 round instead of Canelo by 8, what would the problem be?

[GaMo]

Because if the corrupt or incompetent judge had scored it correctly GGG would have won.

What is not to understand?

Ok. I believe what @GaMo is saying is if Byrd had judged it to Canelo by 1 round instead of Canelo by 8, what would the problem be?

Yeah, glad you understand

[Master]

Because if the corrupt or incompetent judge had scored it correctly GGG would have won.

What is not to understand?

Ok. I believe what @GaMo is saying is if Byrd had judged it to Canelo by 1 round instead of Canelo by 8, what would the problem be?

In all probability the neutral judge would have given it to GGG and that is the problem. One judge has already had Canelo the winner even before the fight started.

[Gandalf]

Jabs score points and landing more jabs counts more than landing one big punch.

That's your opinion and as per usual it's wrong

Everyone is crying about the 118-110 scorecard
But nobody has had anything to say about the 114-114 card
Which suggests that most people think a draw was fair.

No it doesn't. Most fans and pundits have GGG winning the fight. Note my use of the word 'most' in that last sentence as compared with the possible use of the word 'some'. Most people think a GGG win was fair, but only some would agree that a draw is fair.

Controlling the rounds with your jab is significant too. It isn't as though Canelo was up on the power punches by very much either. GGG outlanded Canelo in most of the rounds and that is what MOST people saw.