Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  11
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 66

Thread: Gennady Golovkin vs Miguel Cotto

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gennady Golovkin vs Miguel Cotto

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Why the double standard if GGG chooses to wait until May for Canelo?
    It's not about double standards. GGG chooses to fight more regularly, because at his age he needs every payday he can get.
    If team Canelo wish to wait till May , that's up to them. (I think it's bollocks but hey ho!)
    My point is that from now on in , these 2 BOTH need to make top matches up and nothing else will do.
    No more easy fights, people are putting these two at the top of the tree, they both need to prove it.
    I'm pissed off with people having major profiles and not living up to it.
    I was referring to Ron's post that said "It's different for GGG, if he's coming back with Canelo in May that does nothing to prove who is best at 160".

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    691
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gennady Golovkin vs Miguel Cotto

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Why the double standard if GGG chooses to wait until May for Canelo?
    It's not about double standards. GGG chooses to fight more regularly, because at his age he needs every payday he can get.
    If team Canelo wish to wait till May , that's up to them. (I think it's bollocks but hey ho!)
    My point is that from now on in , these 2 BOTH need to make top matches up and nothing else will do.
    No more easy fights, people are putting these two at the top of the tree, they both need to prove it.
    I'm pissed off with people having major profiles and not living up to it.
    I was referring to Ron's post that said "It's different for GGG, if he's coming back with Canelo in May that does nothing to prove who is best at 160".
    Yes, beating Canelo proves nothing at MW. If Canelo goes on to have a good career at MW it will add to GGGs accomplishments. But so far all Canelo has done at MW is lose to GGG.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gennady Golovkin vs Miguel Cotto

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Why the double standard if GGG chooses to wait until May for Canelo?
    It's not about double standards. GGG chooses to fight more regularly, because at his age he needs every payday he can get.
    If team Canelo wish to wait till May , that's up to them. (I think it's bollocks but hey ho!)
    My point is that from now on in , these 2 BOTH need to make top matches up and nothing else will do.
    No more easy fights, people are putting these two at the top of the tree, they both need to prove it.
    I'm pissed off with people having major profiles and not living up to it.
    I was referring to Ron's post that said "It's different for GGG, if he's coming back with Canelo in May that does nothing to prove who is best at 160".
    Yes, beating Canelo proves nothing at MW. If Canelo goes on to have a good career at MW it will add to GGGs accomplishments. But so far all Canelo has done at MW is lose to GGG.
    And win the lineal title.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    691
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gennady Golovkin vs Miguel Cotto

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Why the double standard if GGG chooses to wait until May for Canelo?
    It's not about double standards. GGG chooses to fight more regularly, because at his age he needs every payday he can get.
    If team Canelo wish to wait till May , that's up to them. (I think it's bollocks but hey ho!)
    My point is that from now on in , these 2 BOTH need to make top matches up and nothing else will do.
    No more easy fights, people are putting these two at the top of the tree, they both need to prove it.
    I'm pissed off with people having major profiles and not living up to it.
    I was referring to Ron's post that said "It's different for GGG, if he's coming back with Canelo in May that does nothing to prove who is best at 160".
    Yes, beating Canelo proves nothing at MW. If Canelo goes on to have a good career at MW it will add to GGGs accomplishments. But so far all Canelo has done at MW is lose to GGG.
    And win the lineal title.
    I don't give two squirts about fake things like that. Cotto didn't beat the real Sergio, so Canelo didn't beat the real MW champ. Plus we all knew GGG was the real MW champ. Sergio knew that, or he would hace fought GGG, Cotto knew that or he would have fought GGG. Canelo tried to wait GGG out, he just couldn't.

    GGG can have 40 MW defenses and it will mean less than having 5 really good defenses. In the end it's about who you fight. Look at Sugar Ray Leonard. He only had 13 championship fights total. But he is a legend and always will be because in those 13 there are like 7 fights against HOF guys.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gennady Golovkin vs Miguel Cotto

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Why the double standard if GGG chooses to wait until May for Canelo?
    It's not about double standards. GGG chooses to fight more regularly, because at his age he needs every payday he can get.
    If team Canelo wish to wait till May , that's up to them. (I think it's bollocks but hey ho!)
    My point is that from now on in , these 2 BOTH need to make top matches up and nothing else will do.
    No more easy fights, people are putting these two at the top of the tree, they both need to prove it.
    I'm pissed off with people having major profiles and not living up to it.
    I was referring to Ron's post that said "It's different for GGG, if he's coming back with Canelo in May that does nothing to prove who is best at 160".
    Yes, beating Canelo proves nothing at MW. If Canelo goes on to have a good career at MW it will add to GGGs accomplishments. But so far all Canelo has done at MW is lose to GGG.
    And win the lineal title.
    I don't give two squirts about fake things like that. Cotto didn't beat the real Sergio, so Canelo didn't beat the real MW champ. Plus we all knew GGG was the real MW champ. Sergio knew that, or he would hace fought GGG, Cotto knew that or he would have fought GGG. Canelo tried to wait GGG out, he just couldn't.

    GGG can have 40 MW defenses and it will mean less than having 5 really good defenses. In the end it's about who you fight. Look at Sugar Ray Leonard. He only had 13 championship fights total. But he is a legend and always will be because in those 13 there are like 7 fights against HOF guys.
    Speaking for others? You might not recognize the lineage but I did. So Martinez wasn't the lineal champion? I think he was, he entered under the middleweight limit and lost. The lineage continues in my eyes. Not trying to convert you but that's my thinking. The champion is not always the best fighter in the division. Best vs champ can be 2 different things. Take Spinks/ Tyson for example.

    Not sure where you're going with the last part because I agree that you should be regarded by the opposition you fought.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    691
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gennady Golovkin vs Miguel Cotto

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Why the double standard if GGG chooses to wait until May for Canelo?
    It's not about double standards. GGG chooses to fight more regularly, because at his age he needs every payday he can get.
    If team Canelo wish to wait till May , that's up to them. (I think it's bollocks but hey ho!)
    My point is that from now on in , these 2 BOTH need to make top matches up and nothing else will do.
    No more easy fights, people are putting these two at the top of the tree, they both need to prove it.
    I'm pissed off with people having major profiles and not living up to it.
    I was referring to Ron's post that said "It's different for GGG, if he's coming back with Canelo in May that does nothing to prove who is best at 160".
    Yes, beating Canelo proves nothing at MW. If Canelo goes on to have a good career at MW it will add to GGGs accomplishments. But so far all Canelo has done at MW is lose to GGG.
    And win the lineal title.
    I don't give two squirts about fake things like that. Cotto didn't beat the real Sergio, so Canelo didn't beat the real MW champ. Plus we all knew GGG was the real MW champ. Sergio knew that, or he would hace fought GGG, Cotto knew that or he would have fought GGG. Canelo tried to wait GGG out, he just couldn't.

    GGG can have 40 MW defenses and it will mean less than having 5 really good defenses. In the end it's about who you fight. Look at Sugar Ray Leonard. He only had 13 championship fights total. But he is a legend and always will be because in those 13 there are like 7 fights against HOF guys.
    Speaking for others? You might not recognize the lineage but I did. So Martinez wasn't the lineal champion? I think he was, he entered under the middleweight limit and lost. The lineage continues in my eyes. Not trying to convert you but that's my thinking. The champion is not always the best fighter in the division. Best vs champ can be 2 different things. Take Spinks/ Tyson for example.

    Not sure where you're going with the last part because I agree that you should be regarded by the opposition you fought.
    Once Sergio ducked GGG his lineage was gone as far as I'm concerned. Cotto never fought Sergio, he fought a cripple pretending to be Sergio. So Cotto never was lineal, so Canelo never was lineal. As far as I'm concerned the chain was broken when the champions refused to behave as champions.

    The last part is about GGGs legacy so far is built on KOs and number of defenses. He needs the quality opponents to have a lasting legacy. Look how little Calzaghe is discussed, he has the SMW record but when he comes up we usually discuss how talented he was and how underwhelming his CV is. GGG needs the quality opposition to avoid his career being judged like that. He needs to fight the best MWs to have a chance at a lasting legacy.

    It can be argued, not rightly in my opinion but it can be argued, GGG has only beaten 1 of the current top 10 MWs(if a person had Jacobs and Canelo fights even)even though he has spent his entire career at MW. He needs to either move up to challenge himself or fight the top MWs. Looking at more middle of the pack Jr Middles doesn't cut it

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gennady Golovkin vs Miguel Cotto

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Why the double standard if GGG chooses to wait until May for Canelo?
    It's not about double standards. GGG chooses to fight more regularly, because at his age he needs every payday he can get.
    If team Canelo wish to wait till May , that's up to them. (I think it's bollocks but hey ho!)
    My point is that from now on in , these 2 BOTH need to make top matches up and nothing else will do.
    No more easy fights, people are putting these two at the top of the tree, they both need to prove it.
    I'm pissed off with people having major profiles and not living up to it.
    I was referring to Ron's post that said "It's different for GGG, if he's coming back with Canelo in May that does nothing to prove who is best at 160".
    Yes, beating Canelo proves nothing at MW. If Canelo goes on to have a good career at MW it will add to GGGs accomplishments. But so far all Canelo has done at MW is lose to GGG.
    And win the lineal title.
    I don't give two squirts about fake things like that. Cotto didn't beat the real Sergio, so Canelo didn't beat the real MW champ. Plus we all knew GGG was the real MW champ. Sergio knew that, or he would hace fought GGG, Cotto knew that or he would have fought GGG. Canelo tried to wait GGG out, he just couldn't.

    GGG can have 40 MW defenses and it will mean less than having 5 really good defenses. In the end it's about who you fight. Look at Sugar Ray Leonard. He only had 13 championship fights total. But he is a legend and always will be because in those 13 there are like 7 fights against HOF guys.
    Speaking for others? You might not recognize the lineage but I did. So Martinez wasn't the lineal champion? I think he was, he entered under the middleweight limit and lost. The lineage continues in my eyes. Not trying to convert you but that's my thinking. The champion is not always the best fighter in the division. Best vs champ can be 2 different things. Take Spinks/ Tyson for example.

    Not sure where you're going with the last part because I agree that you should be regarded by the opposition you fought.
    Once Sergio ducked GGG his lineage was gone as far as I'm concerned. Cotto never fought Sergio, he fought a cripple pretending to be Sergio. So Cotto never was lineal, so Canelo never was lineal. As far as I'm concerned the chain was broken when the champions refused to behave as champions.

    The last part is about GGGs legacy so far is built on KOs and number of defenses. He needs the quality opponents to have a lasting legacy. Look how little Calzaghe is discussed, he has the SMW record but when he comes up we usually discuss how talented he was and how underwhelming his CV is. GGG needs the quality opposition to avoid his career being judged like that. He needs to fight the best MWs to have a chance at a lasting legacy.

    It can be argued, not rightly in my opinion but it can be argued, GGG has only beaten 1 of the current top 10 MWs(if a person had Jacobs and Canelo fights even)even though he has spent his entire career at MW. He needs to either move up to challenge himself or fight the top MWs. Looking at more middle of the pack Jr Middles doesn't cut it
    Your entitled to your opinion and so are others. The man that beat the man. Hopkins reestablished the 160 lineage and it continued down the Canelo. 'Evolved from its predecessor' is the definition.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Why the hate for Gennady Golovkin?
    By Freedom in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 09-12-2016, 07:05 PM
  2. Gennady Golovkin vs. Miguel Cotto: who would win?
    By Freedom in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 06-11-2014, 10:24 PM
  3. Gennady Golovkin
    By Rantcatrat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-30-2009, 10:08 AM
  4. Gennady Golovkin
    By Rantcatrat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-07-2009, 07:02 PM
  5. Gennady Golovkin
    By Mikkel_K in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-19-2008, 03:02 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing