Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  64
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 218

Thread: Loma vs Rigo finalized Dec 9th

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Loma vs Rigo finalized Dec 9th

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    So, in this weeks episode of boxing fuckery,,,,the WBA has decided if Rigo loses this 130 fight he loses his 122 belt. His belt that “is not on the line”

    Such complete BS
    Yeah that's BS, he only defended it in June, even if that fight was changed to a nc. Has Rigo indicated to them that he won't be returning to 122? I know he has expressed interest in fighting a number of feathers who ran from him.
    If he wins against Loma he has 5 days to tell them if he will return to 122 or else he’s stripped too. That seems unnecessarily short. Give the guy a month, let him feel for offers


    Source?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Loma vs Rigo finalized Dec 9th

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    So, in this weeks episode of boxing fuckery,,,,the WBA has decided if Rigo loses this 130 fight he loses his 122 belt. His belt that “is not on the line”

    Such complete BS
    Yeah that's BS, he only defended it in June, even if that fight was changed to a nc. Has Rigo indicated to them that he won't be returning to 122? I know he has expressed interest in fighting a number of feathers who ran from him.
    If he wins against Loma he has 5 days to tell them if he will return to 122 or else he’s stripped too. That seems unnecessarily short. Give the guy a month, let him feel for offers


    Source?
    Yea 5 days is a pretty quick turn around. Rigo had been mucked around so much by the sanctioning bodies, stripping and then reinstated etc.
    They live, We sleep

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,048
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Loma vs Rigo finalized Dec 9th

    Not clear on same day weight check, is 138 max rehydration clause? If I'm going by his last fight Loma will be cutting it close. Still think Rigo really needed a fight to wear in the new bulk he's putting on.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,481
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1084
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Loma vs Rigo finalized Dec 9th

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Not clear on same day weight check, is 138 max rehydration clause? If I'm going by his last fight Loma will be cutting it close. Still think Rigo really needed a fight to wear in the new bulk he's putting on.
    From what i understand the fights at 130. 138 is the max both fighters can weigh the morning of the fight @9am. After that I guess its a free for all at the buffet till the night of. Very similar situation to what the GGG /Jacobs situation should've/would've been had Jacobs not blown off the IBF weigh in. Ideally you just start sipping water/sodium or electrolytes after the weigh in so your body takes on the water before your body purges it in that first couple of hours. Your body will need the water to process any food. Small snacks help if you can manage them. (in this case water/electrolytes/ etc will max out at 8lbs) Then after then after the second weigh in transition from snacks/ pedialyte/ Gatorade, chicken stock to small meals so your body can absorb it. It's the only way to keep the food water down in that time frame.

    Starve/drain yourself too much and then stuff yourself after a weigh in will just having you puking into a wastepaper basket like mikey garcia in an elevator and bloating before the JM Lopez fight. Your body knows it doesn't have the water to process the food and starts heaving... any nutrition that does make its way into your body, your body clings to and stores. You lose your titles on the scales and you're weak from all the retching.
    They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.

    Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Loma vs Rigo finalized Dec 9th

    Loma tends to come in around 139. I think he'll be fine for this.
    They live, We sleep

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,048
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Loma vs Rigo finalized Dec 9th

    Still convinced some of the higher tier guys see the drain coming and not looking for the rehydration done properly. They just choose to take the 10 20k penalty which sounds crazy to working stiffs like ourselves but it's an investment for them to fight 'heavy-healthy' and sure up what are already favorable odds to get to higher stakes and bigger show downs. The pressure actually shifts to the opponent before the bell even rings to agree to terms last minute or bring on cancellation of fight and a rare opportunity they may not get again. Sounds overly simplistic but a contract ensuring a shared weight should be just that no questions or qualifiers need apply. Shaking a few thousand at it or 'losing' a trinket..though retaining rank..seems a slap on the wrist.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Loma vs Rigo finalized Dec 9th

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Still convinced some of the higher tier guys see the drain coming and not looking for the rehydration done properly. They just choose to take the 10 20k penalty which sounds crazy to working stiffs like ourselves but it's an investment for them to fight 'heavy-healthy' and sure up what are already favorable odds to get to higher stakes and bigger show downs. The pressure actually shifts to the opponent before the bell even rings to agree to terms last minute or bring on cancellation of fight and a rare opportunity they may not get again. Sounds overly simplistic but a contract ensuring a shared weight should be just that no questions or qualifiers need apply. Shaking a few thousand at it or 'losing' a trinket..though retaining rank..seems a slap on the wrist.
    This is so true, those fighters in position to lose a few thousand will take that advantage. I'm thinking promoters should have a back up fighter ready like they have in the WBSS, if one guy misses weight he's out, no purse or fight for him. I was thinking a bigger purse penalty but when you get guys like Floyd missing weight for Marquez it's not a huge dent in the wallet. We really need the commissions to step up and start getting strict on some of this sh-t. I'd include the sanctioning bodies but we all know they are basically toothless and for sale to the highest bidder.
    They live, We sleep

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-23-2016, 01:50 AM
  2. Rigo says he will go to 126 for Loma
    By Ron Swanson in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-17-2015, 01:35 AM
  3. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-01-2014, 06:21 PM
  4. Alexander-Maidana close to being finalized for Jan/Feb
    By FinitoElDinamita in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 12-03-2011, 09:41 AM
  5. Williams-Wright fight is finalized
    By boricua in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-05-2009, 03:20 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing