Who do you rate as the current P4P #1?

[powerpuncher]

Loma has the strongest condensed resume as well as being visually the best.

Crawford has never faced an elite champion

Garcia similar to Crawford.

Those two are not even close to Loma.

Loma hasn’t either. I guarantee that Crawford would absolutely destroy Loma at 140 just like Loma did to Rigo at 130. Crawford has proven over and over that he is the best. I’m not saying that Loma won’t take him over, but at the moment, Crawford is still #1.

Loma has beat better than Crawford.

Golovkin is in front of Crawford too. I guarantee that he would absolutely destroy Crawford at 160. He has proven over and over that he is the best.

Anyone rating Crawford no.1 is doing so because they're dazzled by bling. Simple as. I'm interested in substance.

Crawford has beaten tons of good fighters. He has dominated too. He has shown that he can do just about everything in the ring. His biggest weakness is probably inside fighting.

I don’t buy that Loma has beaten better opposition. Crawford has more solid fights in his career than Loma even has fights. And I’m not that impressed by GGG. He is obviously good but not #1 p4p good. If he were better than Crawford, he would have won every round against Canelo.

[imp]

Winning every round against Canelo would not guarantee anything.

Canelo will never be considered P4P until he at least beats GGG and BJS.

[Fenster]

Loma has the strongest condensed resume as well as being visually the best.

Crawford has never faced an elite champion

Garcia similar to Crawford.

Those two are not even close to Loma.

Loma hasn’t either. I guarantee that Crawford would absolutely destroy Loma at 140 just like Loma did to Rigo at 130. Crawford has proven over and over that he is the best. I’m not saying that Loma won’t take him over, but at the moment, Crawford is still #1.

Loma has beat better than Crawford.

Golovkin is in front of Crawford too. I guarantee that he would absolutely destroy Crawford at 160. He has proven over and over that he is the best.

Anyone rating Crawford no.1 is doing so because they're dazzled by bling. Simple as. I'm interested in substance.

Crawford has beaten tons of good fighters. He has dominated too. He has shown that he can do just about everything in the ring. His biggest weakness is probably inside fighting.

I don’t buy that Loma has beaten better opposition. Crawford has more solid fights in his career than Loma even has fights. And I’m not that impressed by GGG. He is obviously good but not #1 p4p good. If he were better than Crawford, he would have won every round against Canelo.

If Golovkin was better than Crawford he would have beat Canelo 12-0? Damn... cool argument, bro, cool argument.

I'm not selling anything for you to buy, scream Crawford is the best all you like, It wont change the fact Loma is P4P no.1. Fact. Or Golovkin. Fact.

Since when did you guys decide who was the best.

The truth is obvious.

[powerpuncher]

Loma has the strongest condensed resume as well as being visually the best.

Crawford has never faced an elite champion

Garcia similar to Crawford.

Those two are not even close to Loma.

Loma hasn’t either. I guarantee that Crawford would absolutely destroy Loma at 140 just like Loma did to Rigo at 130. Crawford has proven over and over that he is the best. I’m not saying that Loma won’t take him over, but at the moment, Crawford is still #1.

Loma has beat better than Crawford.

Golovkin is in front of Crawford too. I guarantee that he would absolutely destroy Crawford at 160. He has proven over and over that he is the best.

Anyone rating Crawford no.1 is doing so because they're dazzled by bling. Simple as. I'm interested in substance.

Crawford has beaten tons of good fighters. He has dominated too. He has shown that he can do just about everything in the ring. His biggest weakness is probably inside fighting.

I don’t buy that Loma has beaten better opposition. Crawford has more solid fights in his career than Loma even has fights. And I’m not that impressed by GGG. He is obviously good but not #1 p4p good. If he were better than Crawford, he would have won every round against Canelo.

If Golovkin was better than Crawford he would have beat Canelo 12-0? Damn... cool argument, bro, cool argument.

I'm not selling anything for you to buy, scream Crawford is the best all you like, It wont change the fact Loma is P4P no.1. Fact. Or Golovkin. Fact.

Since when did you guys decide who was the best.

The truth is obvious.

Huh? So my arguments that Crawford has fought better opposition is dumb yet you are allowed to say Loma and GGG are better than Crawford. Fact. I think you are confused with what a fact is. You have literally made no argument and just called my stupid. I think you need to rethink what you wrote. I’ll give you another try to not look ignorant because I know you are better than this.

[Fenster]

Loma has the strongest condensed resume as well as being visually the best.

Crawford has never faced an elite champion

Garcia similar to Crawford.

Those two are not even close to Loma.

Loma hasn’t either. I guarantee that Crawford would absolutely destroy Loma at 140 just like Loma did to Rigo at 130. Crawford has proven over and over that he is the best. I’m not saying that Loma won’t take him over, but at the moment, Crawford is still #1.

Loma has beat better than Crawford.

Golovkin is in front of Crawford too. I guarantee that he would absolutely destroy Crawford at 160. He has proven over and over that he is the best.

Anyone rating Crawford no.1 is doing so because they're dazzled by bling. Simple as. I'm interested in substance.

Crawford has beaten tons of good fighters. He has dominated too. He has shown that he can do just about everything in the ring. His biggest weakness is probably inside fighting.

I don’t buy that Loma has beaten better opposition. Crawford has more solid fights in his career than Loma even has fights. And I’m not that impressed by GGG. He is obviously good but not #1 p4p good. If he were better than Crawford, he would have won every round against Canelo.

If Golovkin was better than Crawford he would have beat Canelo 12-0? Damn... cool argument, bro, cool argument.

I'm not selling anything for you to buy, scream Crawford is the best all you like, It wont change the fact Loma is P4P no.1. Fact. Or Golovkin. Fact.

Since when did you guys decide who was the best.

The truth is obvious.

Huh? So my arguments that Crawford has fought better opposition is dumb yet you are allowed to say Loma and GGG are better than Crawford. Fact. I think you are confused with what a fact is. You have literally made no argument and just called my stupid. I think you need to rethink what you wrote. I’ll give you another try to not look ignorant because I know you are better than this.

I think you're confused, bro, I didn't call you anything, I even praised you for your great debate skills.

If he were better than Crawford, he would have won every round against Canelo

[powerpuncher]

Okay. So you have no argument. No problem

[Fenster]

Okay. So you have no argument. No problem

Your argument that Loma isn't best because I wrong is right. I rethink Golovkin not winning Canelo every round. And never bested all rounds over Jacobs.

Crawford winned Ricky Burns all rounds. And Pistol.

If he were better than Crawford, he would have won every round against Canelo

[powerpuncher]

Okay. So you have no argument. No problem

Your argument that Loma isn't best because I wrong is right. I rethink Golovkin not winning Canelo every round. And never bested all rounds over Jacobs.

Crawford winned Ricky Burns all rounds. And Pistol.

If he were better than Crawford, he would have won every round against Canelo

I have no idea what you just wrote. I’m unsure if it was incoherent on purpose, you are drunk, or a lot of autocorrect.