Ok so you don't see how Molyneux is scientifically wrong on issues of race, but I on the other hand haven't seen any scientific evidence on his part to back up his outlandish claims. It so happens National Geographic came out with an issue devoted entirely to race this month. Now like any other publication, NG is given to slanted coverage on some issues.... but they also can't be merely dismissed on every topic. This particular issue is quite good, as it explores the notion of race from different angles. Part of the message is that it is us human beings who are too willing to cubbyhole ourselves into different groups, or "races". The reality is that nowadays the vast majority of people have quite a mix of ethnicities in their DNA. Pure breeds are for dogs. Most of us can claim heritage characteristics from several origins. As time goes by, this becomes even more pronounced. So to hear IQ claims based on race or ethnicity sounds hollow to me.

Molyneux is opinionated. The only difference between him and most of us is that he's gone through the trouble of setting up and maintaining a YouTube platform. He's neither the world's most educated person, nor the most knowledgeable on many of the topics of which he speaks. Again, I'm not saying he's wrong about everything..... only that too many people substitute listening (and watching) the Molyneux's of the cyber world for their own original thoughts and ideas. That, my friend, is dangerous.