What about a nonexistent ham sandwich?
@Kirkland Laing where's the impeachment?
What about a nonexistent ham sandwich?
@Kirkland Laing where's the impeachment?
I hate to say it el kabobs but trump prob will be impeached as the dems we’re talking about it the day after his election. Both of my shitty senators Blumenthal and Murphy are chomping at the bit to do articles of impeachment. I don’t think it will be collusion but the way mueller is throwing around charges around people may say anything to avoid life being ruined by the cocksucker. They might latch on to some business dealing Trump had with Russia when he was an active tycoon. You dig through any billionaires business dealings and I’m sure you can dig up something funny. The guy did business all around the world. As u know, all the constitution states is high crimes and misdemeanors, I don’t know if the federalist papers mentioned anything of what the founders mentioned but it’s a wide birth. Basically I’m the impeachment will be political theatre
By the way I mean impeached but not removed. Pelisi and Schumer are chomping at the bit
The Democrats won't impeach him unless a large chunk of the congressional GOP sign up to the impeachment as well. It would have to be a bipartisan thing if it happened. Whether the GOP would support impeachment or not will depend on how badly they do in November, and they may well keep control of the House making this a non issue, and also on exactly what the Mueller/SDNY investigations uncover about Trump. The Democrats really don't want to impeach him. Much easier to take on a wounded/drowning in scandal/failed president who has failed to keep his promises and his disastrous four year track record than some generic scandal free vaguely competent Republican like Pence.
No, they won’t give a shit about bipartisanship. That is a bit dumb Kirk I don’t think u know American politics. They will run articles of impeachment even if the are 100% sure it will fail if they get a whiff of anything or they can make bullshit up. Even u should know this Mueller probe is tainted. When a federal judge public ally reams u out it’s a sham. Now indicting companies that don’t exist, it’s frickin insane
Last edited by walrus; 05-23-2018 at 01:24 PM.
Just watch. The last thing they'll want to talk about between now and November is impeachment. They won't commit to definitely impeaching Trump if they take the House. They definitely won't campaign on impeaching Trump. Impeachment would need a two thirds majority in the Senate. The only way it happens is if enough evidence of Trump criminality surfaces to make GOP support of Trump untenable. Even then senior GOPers would go t Trump and tell him to resign or they'll impeach him. They'll give him a face saving way out and a pardon for his illegal activities like Ford gave Nixon.
And the Mueller probe is not tainted at all. Judges routinely bash both prosecutors and defence attorneys. That particular judge is known for attacking prosecutors as a matter of course. And again, just watch who he eventually rules for on the issue he made headlines over. He'll rule for Mueller. But by then some other nonsense will have happened and the pro-Trump media will be distracting you with that instead.
Seriously. The third most senior post in government behind the prez and vp has been indicted and has turned state's evidence against you. Your campaign manager, his replacement campaign manager have both been indicted and one has flipped against you. Several advisers have been indicted/flipped against you. Your right hand man/personal lawyer/man who knows where the bodies are buried is facing certain indictment and will almost certainly flip too. More indictments on the way. And the best defence you can come up with is the prosecutors are biased against me. Ffs.
Kirk, they were talking about impeachment before he got elected, are U seriously thinking it’s not rigged
They can't wind it up. If Trump fired Mueller tomorrow all the investigators on the team just keep on investigating. They still keep subpoeanaing and interviewing and putting witnesses in front of the grand jury. Once this thing started and got moving that's it, it's like a freight train. It's only stopping when the investigation has run its course. They're prevented by law from ending an investigation that hasn't run its course.
Trump can try and fire the head of the FBI or maybe a bunch of people at the FBI but there'd be a revolt by the entire law enforcement community, it'd be banana republic stuff. And it didn't work out so well the last timehe tried firing the FBI chief, did it? That led directly to Mueller.
Plus firing people at the DOJ was the beginning of the end for Nixon too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Massacre
I can only imagine your reaction if the Kenyan tyrant fired a special prosecutor looking into an expanding mass of evidence of criminality with members of the Obama campaign/administration already facing charges........
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks