Denilson..... it seems you are back
"no white man can be African"? How is that different from a white supremacist saying that no black man could ever be British?
Killing and mistreating white peoples because of the sins of their ancestors in South Africa? How is that different from what they did? How is that better? Surely you know the long term outcome of that, because we have already seen it in reverse?
Are you from Africa?
There is no such thing as 'African' .... there is more genetic diversity amongst 'black' races than 'white' ones. A Kikuyu is more racially different to a Ibo than a Frenchman is from a German.
So, how can you categorise 'black' people as if they are all one thing? Following your rather simplified history lesson, the Bantu did migrate and effectively wipe out the San, Khoikhoi and Bushmen ... they were not the same race, despite being 'black' brothers. The Zulu and Matabele massacred everybody in their way very happily indeed, as did the Masai.
You are just a huge ball of bile, directed at anything 'white', whatever that means.
And, yes, I have been to Zim regularly over the past decades. I have family there. The situation is much more nuanced than your facile description.
Where are you actually from and where do you live? What on earth gives you the wherewithal to be a spokesman for 'Africa' and the billions of people around the world of African descent?
Really, I'm genuinely interested.
Bookmarks