I don't see anything wrong here he was for the Indian Revolution he can't also be for all the revolutions all around the world he was there to serve the Indians and he single-handedly defeated the evil white British Empire
I don't see anything wrong here he was for the Indian Revolution he can't also be for all the revolutions all around the world he was there to serve the Indians and he single-handedly defeated the evil white British Empire
What about people who are for the current British revolution like Tommy Robinson?
Do they have the right to look out for their own people, like the poor little British girls who have been victims of paedophiles? Who actually worship an evil pervert who married a 7-year-old girl!
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Anybody who wants to be a revolutionary they can go do whatever they want I have no problem with that let them knock themselves out. Everybody has the right to try to lead a revolution at their own risk.
If Tommy Robinson wants to lead a revolution in the UK then go ahead and let him. Of course he has the right to try. I don't really get the reasoning here. So if Tommy Robinson just wants to help out his own people meaning white people, so be it. Let him be an advocate for white people in the UK. God knows there's enough black advocates for black people in the US and there's enough Hispanic advocates for Hispanic people in the US so what would be wrong with having a white advocate for white people? I don't see what the reasoning is here going on. Mahatma Gandhi did a great thing so I don't really understand what this is about
Protect all victims and catch all perpetrators no matter their race/religion/background.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks