Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  1
Likes Likes:  28
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 102

Thread: Canelo vs Fielding Dec-15

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    566
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Canelo vs Fielding Dec-15

    I'm curious if people would have preferred Lemieux over Fielding?
    They live, We sleep

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,816
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2036
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Canelo vs Fielding Dec-15

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    I'm curious if people would have preferred Lemieux over Fielding?

    I agree with @Spicoli

    Tip toed into 160 is right. Now that he's there and fought GGG twice, he's jumping up to challenge for a title at 168. Screw the other 160-pounders who would give a kidney for a shot at Canelo. Let me get that other belt while the dangerous guys at 160 knock each other out. Predictable, safe, and calculated.

    Sorry... to answer your question. Yes, I would've preferred Lemieux over Fielding.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    566
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Canelo vs Fielding Dec-15

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    I'm curious if people would have preferred Lemieux over Fielding?

    I agree with @Spicoli

    Tip toed into 160 is right. Now that he's there and fought GGG twice, he's jumping up to challenge for a title at 168. Screw the other 160-pounders who would give a kidney for a shot at Canelo. Let me get that other belt while the dangerous guys at 160 knock each other out. Predictable, safe, and calculated.

    Sorry... to answer your question. Yes, I would've preferred Lemieux over Fielding.
    For me they could be considered similar in opposition level.
    They live, We sleep

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Canelo vs Fielding Dec-15

    Just boycott Canelo. Do not watch his fights. DO NOT WATCH!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    566
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Canelo vs Fielding Dec-15

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Just boycott Canelo. Do not watch his fights. DO NOT WATCH!
    Why? The 2nd GGG fight was fantastic.
    They live, We sleep

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,816
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2036
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Canelo vs Fielding Dec-15

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    I'm curious if people would have preferred Lemieux over Fielding?

    I agree with @Spicoli

    Tip toed into 160 is right. Now that he's there and fought GGG twice, he's jumping up to challenge for a title at 168. Screw the other 160-pounders who would give a kidney for a shot at Canelo. Let me get that other belt while the dangerous guys at 160 knock each other out. Predictable, safe, and calculated.

    Sorry... to answer your question. Yes, I would've preferred Lemieux over Fielding.
    For me they could be considered similar in opposition level.

    Not saying otherwise. But stay at 160, which you avoided for so long, and fight all opposition there. Don't pretend you've somehow "cleaned out" 160 and are ready for new challenges. Otherwise, multiple weight titles are a bit meaningless. Remember Canelo initially avoid GGG and trying to goad him to 154..... and now seeing him bolt to grab a belt at 168, is so artificial and meaningless.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    566
    Cool Clicks

    Arrow Re: Canelo vs Fielding Dec-15

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    I'm curious if people would have preferred Lemieux over Fielding?

    I agree with @Spicoli

    Tip toed into 160 is right. Now that he's there and fought GGG twice, he's jumping up to challenge for a title at 168. Screw the other 160-pounders who would give a kidney for a shot at Canelo. Let me get that other belt while the dangerous guys at 160 knock each other out. Predictable, safe, and calculated.

    Sorry... to answer your question. Yes, I would've preferred Lemieux over Fielding.
    For me they could be considered similar in opposition level.

    Not saying otherwise. But stay at 160, which you avoided for so long, and fight all opposition there. Don't pretend you've somehow "cleaned out" 160 and are ready for new challenges. Otherwise, multiple weight titles are a bit meaningless. Remember Canelo initially avoid GGG and trying to goad him to 154..... and now seeing him bolt to grab a belt at 168, is so artificial and meaningless.
    I agree about staying at 160, I think I'm the only one who wants Canelo/ GGG III after the December fight. He is back in the ring quick tho, and as I said Fielding and Lemieux are similar in level.

    It seems like a buffer for Canelo, so he can sit back and see what happens, before deciding if he returns to 160 or not.
    They live, We sleep

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,151
    Mentioned
    439 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5132
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Canelo vs Fielding Dec-15

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    I'm curious if people would have preferred Lemieux over Fielding?

    I agree with @Spicoli

    Tip toed into 160 is right. Now that he's there and fought GGG twice, he's jumping up to challenge for a title at 168. Screw the other 160-pounders who would give a kidney for a shot at Canelo. Let me get that other belt while the dangerous guys at 160 knock each other out. Predictable, safe, and calculated.

    Sorry... to answer your question. Yes, I would've preferred Lemieux over Fielding.
    For me they could be considered similar in opposition level.
    Feels like more of an honest fight for what was building up in front of the fans and every fight his "one punch eraser" is raved on. Then again with Lemieux already being white washed by fellow top 160 BJS and Golovkin it puts Canelo in position to improve on that or live up to in a way. I prefer Lemieux. Fielding is a blank slate State Side and guarantees Canelo all the focused stardom.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Zeuge vs Fielding Sky Sports 14th July 2018
    By Master in forum Fight Threads
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-15-2018, 04:32 PM
  2. Replies: 71
    Last Post: 04-04-2016, 04:45 PM
  3. Fielding is confident going into the Smith fight
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-31-2015, 11:59 PM
  4. Smith-Rebrasse/Fielding-Vera/Bellew/Murray - Fri---SKY
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 06-28-2015, 05:32 PM
  5. Callum Smith - Rocky Fielding set for Sept 26th
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-15-2015, 11:56 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing