What do you mean as good as? Murata has a belt (about the same worth as Charlo's). He should really be undefeated, the win over N'Jikam is better than Heiland and Cermeno. At 160 there's not a lot of difference in records.
Who do I think wins if they fought now? Charlo.
I've never said Murata was a tougher fight. I said he's more relevant to GGG than Charlo. He can make more, and pick up a title against a guy who, to date has done more than Charlo has at 160.
Why fight Charlo in an eliminator, when you can go straight to a title fight, earning double.
Winning a title is just as much of a guarantee at Canelo, as is winning an eliminator.
And I have already said I would prefer the Jacobs/Derevy winner. I think both those guys are tougher than Charlo.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks