..... but surely the bookies were quids in with the draw? Best result they could have had. They would have lost money if Fury got the win.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 6
Dislikes: 0
Array
..... but surely the bookies were quids in with the draw? Best result they could have had. They would have lost money if Fury got the win.
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Array
But it was actually highway robbery, perpetrated by US appointed judges, again. Punters are not mugs, and bookies understand that, its their living. If there is a US based rematch I look forward to an enterprising UK based bookie offering their own 'impartial' judges. Even the most cold blooded UK bookmaker now knows the score and will offer a fairer alternative, otherwise nobody will bet!
People are aware it was a Mexican judge, a British judge and a Canadian judge right?
I agree the fight was wrongly scored but nationality doesn’t seem to be the weak link.
Array
If Wilder won 4 rounds with two 10-8's then it is relatively close. If someome scores a few more close rounds to Wilder (which there were) then a draw is feasible. It was not a robbery. It was one of those Pac/Marquez 1 kind of fights but the knock downs scored more because they were in different rounds rather than all in the same one. If Fury wanted a clear decision he should have done a Calzaghe/Hopkins and only be knocked down the once and then win most of the other rounds. Only 13 punches seperated Wilder and Fury. That is not decisive.
Array
Fury just needed to box smart in the last round and he did not. It cost him the fight.
Array
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks