You don't belive in empirical evidence. You have ROUNDLY dismissed the empirical research of millions of scientists conducted over a couple thousand years in favour of having your ears tickled by loons.
You don't belive in empirical evidence. You have ROUNDLY dismissed the empirical research of millions of scientists conducted over a couple thousand years in favour of having your ears tickled by loons.
As I said earlier, Alpha. The onus is on the Flat Earthers to prove the Earth is flat, not the other way around. When established scientific principles and studies have demonstrated the Earth is round, the accepted fact for hundreds of years, it is up to the Flat Earthers to prove otherwise. So far you've responded with a YouTube clip from a person with questionable credentials, and "proofs" based on observations at altitudes that are minuscule and insignificant when compared to the size of the Earth. Questions of how could a flat Earth move through space without the predictable and calculable destructive stresses have gone pretty much unanswered (or answered unsatisfactorily). Dubay's own assertions about the movement of the Sun are pretty much nonsensical. Honestly, a sun revolving in front of a flat Earth makes no physics sense whatsoever. No answers as to planes and satellites circling the Earth. If the Earth were truly flat..... you travel in a straight line..... you're bound to reach the edge. Has anyone ever SEEN the edge of the Earth?
Again, question the Moon landings all you want. I personally can't produce proof that the landings were real. TBH, I can't fathom such an elaborate, long-lasting, perfectly-coordinated hoax, but....... so be it. Question the Moon landings. But for heavens sakes, man..... when you enter the "world is flat" realm, you lose me altogether.
Stop taking this retard seriously.. it’s a colossal waste.
Michelle seems just as puzzled about this Flat Earth thing as the rest of us are.
What she failed to mention, yet crossed my mind, is that when we observe the full moon in detail, we can make out all the geographical details.... craters, mountains, and such. The Moon is perfectly round which, if we're to dismiss this spherical celestial body notion, would mean the Moon is actually a circle and is also flat. I mean, why would the Earth be flat while the Moon is spherical, right? Yet, each time we observe the full moon, we see different geographical details. Which would only be possible if the Moon were itself spherical and rotated on an axis with respect to Earth. How else to explain the differences in topography?
Anyway, just another thing to consider.
I still think we're all just getting our collective chains pulled.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks