Why do you have to circle the globe north to south? A globe is a globe. You can circle it in an infinite number of ways, including around the equator. Also, airline pilots routinely fly over the North Pole on extremely long flights, such as say New York to Hong Kong. There are some FAA restrictions on flights over Antarctica, but it’s not like it hasn’t been done. The restrictions are mostly based on safety considerations. You believe there’s some sort of conspiracy going on there… that’s fine. We disagree.
Must be comfortable in that easy chair asking for experiments that prove gravity. Again, I don’t happen to have a 5.9 x 1024 mass in my back pocket with which to experiment. And just like lab experiments wanting to model tidal waves fall a wee bit short of the actual reality…. so would any experiment attempting to prove gravity with pitifully smaller scale models. Differences in scale are a reality, whether accepted by you or not.
Do you dive? If so, you must be aware of water pressure at depths. Tell me… what sort of “sealed container” is the ocean contained in, to be able to exert pressure? Oh…. the container theory only applies to atmospheric air? Ok. You repeatedly dismissed my perfectly clear and understandable explanation about gravity holding the atmosphere against the Earth’s surface, and continue clinging to the “container theory.” Ok.
On this I’ll give you some leeway. A religion… yes. But so is the Flat Earthers theories. Too much “black magic”, as I’ve already shown you in previous posts. Nothing provable.
Sun? 1.41 g/cm3
Moon… 3.34 g/cm3
Again with the "Strawman."It's the popular buzzword on the forum these days… cool. I keep bringing up “the edge” because it’s only natural to think that if we in fact live in a flat world, there must be some dimensions. An endless plane? I find that harder to swallow than your hated globe. But then again, there are tons of things we don’t fully understand. The limits of the universe. The beginning of time. Nothing in science has ever even come close to explaining any of those things. So in our arguing over the Earth, there is also that framework of questions neither of us has answers for.
So we're pretty clear that you're not trying to convince me, and I'm not trying to convince you. But certain things beg to be pointed out, such as the use of double standards when you demand everything be proven, while at the same time accepting you don't know why or how some Flat Earth theories would occur. Another thing to be pointed out which I've done repeatedly is explaining the realities of scale. If you ever watched old Godzilla movies, you'll note that the little cardboard skyscrapers didn't collapse the same way real skyscrapers would collapse.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 


It's the popular buzzword on the forum these days… cool. I keep bringing up “the edge” because it’s only natural to think that if we in fact live in a flat world, there must be some dimensions. An endless plane? I find that harder to swallow than your hated globe. But then again, there are tons of things we don’t fully understand. The limits of the universe. The beginning of time. Nothing in science has ever even come close to explaining any of those things. So in our arguing over the Earth, there is also that framework of questions neither of us has answers for.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks