I appreciate your direct insult. It says much about you. Thanks for being so transparent for everyone.
To get to your attempt to spin. Yes, people have said the best way to get the most money is to cut out the American market when they say Fury vs AJ is the most profitable. Americans won’t buy that now. It may be the most profitable in the long run because if Fury Beats Wilder decisively they may buy the unification. That is both markets. But if they fought NOW Americans wouldn’t buy, 1 market, less money. So compare apples to apples. AJ vs Fury is not the biggest money maker NOW and those that suggested that are ignorant or dishonest. And it has been suggested so don’t try to say it hasn’t.
As for your question which is again apples vs oranges rather than apples vs apples, which by the way is a technique used by those attempting to deceive so again giving everyone more information about you, AJ vs Wilder in UK would have made more than Wilder vs Fury in USA. But Wilder would have made less because of the crap offer. Wilder and AJ both would have made most by fighting in the USA, BOTH markets. Don’t narrow options to make a point, that’s deceptive. Broaden it to extrapolate honest informative information. Oh, but honest information isn’t what you want apples to oranges. Looking at it broader you now see the rematch of Wilder vs Fury will make more than Eddie said even the bright star AJ vs Wilder would make in the UK. This is no fault of UK fans, they do their part. But US fans are picky. They want their fights when they want them. To get BOTH markets we all know it must be in the USA to be at the time USA fight fans watch fights. This is transparent apples to apples conversation. Try it. There is nothing arrogant about honesty.
Cheers
Bookmarks