Quote Originally Posted by Beanz View Post
Alpha you just entirely made up things that i am supposedly claiming in order to play pretend again.I never mentioned an ice wall so you obviously don't even understand the very basics of debating. All you have done is admit that actually not only do you believe in gravity but you like everyone else see how it demonstrates itself with water everyday.

Of course water can curve, waves are motion, and droplets are caused due to surface tension. I have already explained adhesion, cohesion and meniscus. These are properties of water that we understand and can test. That's not the claim of the globe. The claim of the globe is that bodies of water can conform to the exterior of a shape. So where do we observe a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape in the natural world? Are you trying to claim that a drop of water has the same properties as a body of water? Or that earth is a drop of water?


You are trying to pretend that everyone else is as thick as pig shit in order to pretend you have an argument.The FACT is that because of gravity, water is pulled towards the centre of the spherical earth. That is precisely why it then fills the troughs and valleys on the surface of this globe. So you are using an argument for a spherical earth to play pretend.Just like the fucking tired old dog whistle to other fearthers

"Water finds it's own level"


That is not a scientific principle it is an old adage meaning like attracts like. Next you will be telling is that Sea Level proves the Earth is flat. "The claim of the globe is that bodies of water can conform to the exterior of a shape."
That has never been the claim of anyone but you and some other very stupid people. Quite the reverse.
The link you posted made a claim of an ice wall. It is a proven fact that a body of water will fill it's container and the surface will be flat/ level/ horizontal whatever term you want to use. This is observable and testable in the natural world. Bodies of water can not conform to the exterior of a shape. The claim is that earth is a sphere, that is covered in more than 70% of water. That is the official claim. And therefore, bodies of water (not droplets of small volume) would need to conform to the exterior of a shape.

Again, show me where we can observe a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape in the physical and natural world.

The natural physics of water and other fluids to always find their level and remain flat. If disturbed in any way, motion ensues until the flat level is resumed. If dammed up then released, the nature of all liquids is to quickly flood outwards taking the easiest course towards finding its new level. This is observable and testable.

And again you have mentioned gravity. So I'll ask again, where can we observe mass attracting to mass in the physical and natural world? And where did Newton observe this originally and what experiment did he perform to prove gravity?

Again you failed to provide even 1 quantifiable proof or scientific evidence for the globe.

You are the one also making false accusations, I am not trying to pretend anyone is a thick as pig sh-t. I am merely questioning the claims of the globe using real science and the scientific method.

You also failed to provide the measurements for the globe at each mile in inches. You claimed the Pythagorean theorem was an ancient method for measuring the curvature, so provide your method and measurements.

Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
The fucking internet should be shut down.
Why? Because people want to question claims using actual real science?

Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
This has 235 replies. @Alpha is the fricking man. I lost a little respect for him when he said I was lying about the talking monkeys but alpha is the frickin man


So would that make you his next possible recruit? I hear it's like a pyramid scheme. The more you convert, the higher up in rank you go. I figure Alpha must be a Flat Earth Admiral by now or something. They could probably use a man with your sense of humor.

I wonder if there are many Flat Earthers among the Scientology cult (serious question). I mean, both depend heavily on being able to brainwash people. Maybe there's a

Flat Earth Cause Extended to Scientology (FECES) group out there.
I'm an individual Tito and don't align myself with any groups or organizations. Those making money of the truth are in it for the wrong reasons. They have conferences and that type of crap, charging for what should be free. I just merely question the claims of the globe using science.

Again I'm not trying to convert anyone, just providing the truth using science. I have always advised others to do their own research and decide for themselves.

I do believe in a creator, but it is only a belief, because I have no empirical evidence to prove that belief. See the difference?

Where as the earth is demonstrably level.

So we have over 200 replies in this thread and no one has provided anything quantifiable for the globe, or anything scientific evidence for it. So where I can provide scientific proof that destroy the claims of the globe, all I have received are assertions and assumptions. Nothing based on science. So who is really brainwashed here?

No measurable curvature.

No scientific evidence that a body of water can conform to the exterior of a shape, or where we can observe this occurrence in the natural world?

No scientific evidence that a gas can be created without a container, or where we can observe this occurrence in the natural world?

No scientific evidence of the motion of the earth?

No scientific evidence of mass attracting to mass in the natural world?

But, but, but I saw pictures, I've seen it on TV.

Come on, they say they have known the earth was a globe for over 2 thousand years, it should be easy to provide something quantifiable to prove the globe.

Fuck off mate. Just fuck off out of it. You're talking to an actual rocket scientist. That's what I'm actually qualified to do anyway. None of these videos are in any way based on science. They're all made by a load of grifters who make money making bullshit videos to fool fucking morons on youtube. The internet ought to be fucking shut down.

Another good reason to shut it down:

https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/25/1...itions-arizona
Great, then you should be able to explain to us where we can observe gas pressure being created without a container in the physical and natural world.