I'll again bring this up just because it's what you asked me to get for you, but you paid it no mind before.....here it is again:
If the FBI knew Steele had that media contact before it submitted the article, it likely would be guilty of
circular intelligence reporting, a forbidden tactic in which two pieces of evidence are portrayed as independent corroboration when, in fact, they originated from the same source. [/I]
Which I'll back up with:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi...team-docs-show
But London court records show that contrary to the FBI's assessments, Steele briefed Yahoo News and other reporters in the fall of 2016 at the direction of Fusion GPS -- the opposition research firm behind the dossier.
The revelations are contained in heavily-redacted documents released over the weekend after a Freedom of Information lawsuit by the organization Judicial Watch.
And just because I am taking absolutely NO joy at all




in this... here's the source documents
https://vault.fbi.gov/d1-release/d1-release/view
Page #22 of 412
September 23rd, 2016 news article written by the news organization's Chief Investigative Correspondent
Hmmm 9/23/2016
Do they mean THIS 9/23/16 article?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-s-intel...175046002.html
Let us see here....who wrote this article? Michael Isikoff.....hmmmm and his title is

?
Chief Investigative Correspondent
Now back to Page #22 of 412:
a well placed Western intelligence source......could that be Christopher Steele

He was "well placed" he was a "Western intelligence source"
Circular Intelligence Reporting -> FISA Warrants
And if that's the case (and it is, you can fucking put it together for yourself....well you could if you were smart) then even if the Trump team DID break the law (which they didn't) the FBI wouldn't be able to charge them because that evidence would all be 'fruit of the poisonous tree' a direct violation of 4th Amendment Rights.
So let me know how you plan on sending me that money

Bookmarks