Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  4
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Pac and undefeated fights.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,983
    Mentioned
    1704 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3141
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac and undefeated fights.

    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Add Thurman to the list.

    Manny has nothing to prove anymore.

    Just retire.
    I would not mind if he retires Khan first and then maybe just go all out against Spence/Crawford.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,075
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    720
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac and undefeated fights.

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Add Thurman to the list.

    Manny has nothing to prove anymore.

    Just retire.
    I would not mind if he retires Khan first and then maybe just go all out against Spence/Crawford.
    He can’t beat them. Why would he walk into an almost sure KO loss? He’s been offered the Crawford fight for years, he knows. Putting him in with those guys is just mean. They aren’t Thurman

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    710
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac and undefeated fights.

    Thurman was undefeated but I wouldn’t say he was in his prime.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,888
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2058
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac and undefeated fights.

    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Thurman was undefeated but I wouldn’t say he was in his prime.


    On which side of his peak would you say he's on? Not disagreeing (well... yes, really)..... just curious. Still hasn't gotten there? Or past it?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,983
    Mentioned
    1704 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3141
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac and undefeated fights.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Thurman was undefeated but I wouldn’t say he was in his prime.


    On which side of his peak would you say he's on? Not disagreeing (well... yes, really)..... just curious. Still hasn't gotten there? Or past it?
    Past it, his best was when he beat Porter and Garcia.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    710
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac and undefeated fights.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Thurman was undefeated but I wouldn’t say he was in his prime.


    On which side of his peak would you say he's on? Not disagreeing (well... yes, really)..... just curious. Still hasn't gotten there? Or past it?
    I think he could be at his peak without his huge layoff but I think everyone saw that he didn’t look great against Lopez. I’m not saying he would or wouldn’t have beaten Pacquiao a few years ago, but I think he was a better fighter 3 years ago when he was more active.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,888
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2058
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac and undefeated fights.

    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Thurman was undefeated but I wouldn’t say he was in his prime.


    On which side of his peak would you say he's on? Not disagreeing (well... yes, really)..... just curious. Still hasn't gotten there? Or past it?
    I think he could be at his peak without his huge layoff but I think everyone saw that he didn’t look great against Lopez. I’m not saying he would or wouldn’t have beaten Pacquiao a few years ago, but I think he was a better fighter 3 years ago when he was more active.

    The layoff is definitely a factor. While being worn out by too many wars is bad...... being inactive for such a long time during your peak years is probably nearly as bad. Yes, he looked horrible against Lopez. It's what had a lot of people giving Manny more of a chance to beat him. Logically Manny should not have been able to do that. Then again Manny defied the odds when he went up all those weight classes and took out some great fighters.

    So I'm thinking he's at his physical peak..... but that peak has become a bit blunted by the inactivity.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    710
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac and undefeated fights.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Thurman was undefeated but I wouldn’t say he was in his prime.


    On which side of his peak would you say he's on? Not disagreeing (well... yes, really)..... just curious. Still hasn't gotten there? Or past it?
    I think he could be at his peak without his huge layoff but I think everyone saw that he didn’t look great against Lopez. I’m not saying he would or wouldn’t have beaten Pacquiao a few years ago, but I think he was a better fighter 3 years ago when he was more active.

    The layoff is definitely a factor. While being worn out by too many wars is bad...... being inactive for such a long time during your peak years is probably nearly as bad. Yes, he looked horrible against Lopez. It's what had a lot of people giving Manny more of a chance to beat him. Logically Manny should not have been able to do that. Then again Manny defied the odds when he went up all those weight classes and took out some great fighters.

    So I'm thinking he's at his physical peak..... but that peak has become a bit blunted by the inactivity.
    Like I said in another thread, this was a great match up and they knew it. When you are a huge name in boxing, you can pick and choose who you want to fight. You generally pick guys who you know you can beat with the biggest name. There is a reason he didn’t fight Spence or Crawford. He knows that he will lose to both of them. He saw Thurman looking rusty and knew that Thurman had a lot of flaws that could be exploited so he chose that fight. A fight against a named fighter who he matched up well against and could fight him at the right time.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-01-2014, 03:50 AM
  2. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-14-2013, 03:36 AM
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-09-2006, 07:31 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-13-2006, 05:38 PM
  5. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 04-30-2006, 12:31 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing