Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  3
Likes Likes:  23
Dislikes Dislikes:  1
Results 1 to 15 of 109

Thread: The "Can We Keep it Civil?" Thread

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,825
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2038
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The "Can We Keep it Civil?" Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Denilson-The-Comeback View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Denilson-The-Comeback View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    I think there is a very solid observation if the IQ differences are all occurring in the same nation as in the US. It seems pretty cut and dry in terms of the research into race and IQ. There are of course exceptional people in any group and there are unexceptional people in any group, but it just means that as a whole the intelligence levels are significantly different. Thus it is that the East Asians in America perform the best in terms of family structure, academic performance, and overall economic outcomes. There are the Ashkenazi Jews too of course who fly off the radar when it comes to IQ. In saying that of course you treat everyone as an individual and so one can either perform well on an intelligence test or they can't. The controversy is really about nature versus nurture rather than if there are differences. It is undeniable unless we are going to burn the plethora of research data compiled over decades and delete it from the Internet.

    I get why it is sticky, but I just think people should be treated as individuals thus no affirmative action and reduced welfare incentives and let the genuinely talented rise. By looking at IQ we learn about behavior too thus we can see who is more likely to be a single Mum or a criminal and so on. It is not absolute by any stretch, but by just preaching racism and social injustice is not really the full picture. The left wants to eliminate IQ debate as it means accepting that we simply are not all the same from an intelligence basis. However, we are of course all people and should aspire to better performance.
    Here's a question I've asked many times from you guys who are always running around trying to prove how stupid black people are.

    What do you do with a race of black people who you claim are dumb (ON average) ?

    I don't care what you think of black intelligence because frankly call me intellectually inferor all day

    I don't give a sh*t about that

    You are saying (On average) your smarter than me because your white and I'm black

    YES YOU ARE

    Happy now ?

    Now what ?

    And that's were guys like you wimp out when it's comes to the doing part. And that's thing about white supremacy "Tell black people what they are but never say what we are gonna do"

    And guess what ?

    If whites turned around and said "We are gonna finally stop telling black ppl what they are and we are gonna tell them what we are gonna do. Tune in at 9"

    I'd be like



    And if they turned around and said "We are gonna kill every black person on the planet or die trying"

    Once again I'd be like



    And I'd go down fighting

    Stop talking. Stop trying to prove points. We don't need points. Either do justice or let's just get it on for the last time and for the final time

    Period.
    He explains the points so people like you can understand. It isn't about you being black or white is just because you are a total fuckwit with a inferiority complex, nobody else here gives a crap about colour only you.
    Beanz is a jew , I am white , Rey is Hispanic , Master is Indian and your a cunt, see we didnt need to bring colour into it to prove a point.
    Yes I'm inferior. Yes I'm a fkwit

    Now what ?

    Get to the doing part.


    You're in the wrong thread, Denilson. You have a dozen other threads in which to spout your racist nonsense. This one specifically says is for keeping it civil...... although kudos to @Dark Lord Al for putting things perfectly into perspective.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,825
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2038
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The "Can We Keep it Civil?" Thread

    On another note..... interesting to see the absence of "Fenny & Beanie" from this thread, which the laconic (British term for... oops... never mind... it's a civil thread) Fenny called (cough) "bait."

    A thread that attempts to establish civil conversation between currently combatant posters is called "bait" by one of Saddo's "esteemed" Mods. Hmm.... interesting indeed.

    My theory is that said Mod only thrives on hostility, anger and confrontation.

    Thus any attempt at civil conversation is ignored and/or scorned.



    Oh well.... c'est la vie.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    925
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The "Can We Keep it Civil?" Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    On another note..... interesting to see the absence of "Fenny & Beanie" from this thread, which the laconic (British term for... oops... never mind... it's a civil thread) Fenny called (cough) "bait."

    A thread that attempts to establish civil conversation between currently combatant posters is called "bait" by one of Saddo's "esteemed" Mods. Hmm.... interesting indeed.

    My theory is that said Mod only thrives on hostility, anger and confrontation.

    Thus any attempt at civil conversation is ignored and/or scorned.



    Oh well.... c'est la vie.
    I seriously didn’t think he was calling this one bait. I figured I probably said something stupid in another thread which I do a lot and there is no way I could keep track. I found this to be an honest attempt by my man tits to cool things down I don’t see that as bait. Agreeing with you is bait?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,825
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2038
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The "Can We Keep it Civil?" Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    On another note..... interesting to see the absence of "Fenny & Beanie" from this thread, which the laconic (British term for... oops... never mind... it's a civil thread) Fenny called (cough) "bait."

    A thread that attempts to establish civil conversation between currently combatant posters is called "bait" by one of Saddo's "esteemed" Mods. Hmm.... interesting indeed.

    My theory is that said Mod only thrives on hostility, anger and confrontation.

    Thus any attempt at civil conversation is ignored and/or scorned.



    Oh well.... c'est la vie.
    I seriously didn’t think he was calling this one bait. I figured I probably said something stupid in another thread which I do a lot and there is no way I could keep track. I found this to be an honest attempt by my man tits to cool things down I don’t see that as bait. Agreeing with you is bait?


    Good man.

    You've taken the spirit of this thread above and beyond with that last comment. Throwing Fenny (of "Beanie & Fenny") a bone. "You........ you're good you!"

    But Fenny (of "Beanie & Fenny") said the following:

    "Are you disappointed nobody took the bait in your good buddy Tito's thread?"



    My only started threads before this one were a Ruiz-Joshua poll.... an arcade problem thread.... and a transphobic quiz.

    And Fenny (of "Beanie & Fenny") could not have been referring to that one, since if so then he took the "bait" by answering the quiz and twisting the definition of the word "pervert" which actually applies to him.

    So no....... I'm pretty sure Fenny (of "Beanie & Fenny") meant THIS thread.



    But we've regressed.

    We must go back to discussing current issues civilly and maturely, and leave the Denilsons and Fennys (of "Beanie and Fenny") of this world to crash the thread with their racism (the former) and antagonism (the latter).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,150
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1396
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The "Can We Keep it Civil?" Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Denilson-The-Comeback View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Denilson-The-Comeback View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    I think there is a very solid observation if the IQ differences are all occurring in the same nation as in the US. It seems pretty cut and dry in terms of the research into race and IQ. There are of course exceptional people in any group and there are unexceptional people in any group, but it just means that as a whole the intelligence levels are significantly different. Thus it is that the East Asians in America perform the best in terms of family structure, academic performance, and overall economic outcomes. There are the Ashkenazi Jews too of course who fly off the radar when it comes to IQ. In saying that of course you treat everyone as an individual and so one can either perform well on an intelligence test or they can't. The controversy is really about nature versus nurture rather than if there are differences. It is undeniable unless we are going to burn the plethora of research data compiled over decades and delete it from the Internet.

    I get why it is sticky, but I just think people should be treated as individuals thus no affirmative action and reduced welfare incentives and let the genuinely talented rise. By looking at IQ we learn about behavior too thus we can see who is more likely to be a single Mum or a criminal and so on. It is not absolute by any stretch, but by just preaching racism and social injustice is not really the full picture. The left wants to eliminate IQ debate as it means accepting that we simply are not all the same from an intelligence basis. However, we are of course all people and should aspire to better performance.
    Here's a question I've asked many times from you guys who are always running around trying to prove how stupid black people are.

    What do you do with a race of black people who you claim are dumb (ON average) ?

    I don't care what you think of black intelligence because frankly call me intellectually inferor all day

    I don't give a sh*t about that

    You are saying (On average) your smarter than me because your white and I'm black

    YES YOU ARE

    Happy now ?

    Now what ?

    And that's were guys like you wimp out when it's comes to the doing part. And that's thing about white supremacy "Tell black people what they are but never say what we are gonna do"

    And guess what ?

    If whites turned around and said "We are gonna finally stop telling black ppl what they are and we are gonna tell them what we are gonna do. Tune in at 9"

    I'd be like



    And if they turned around and said "We are gonna kill every black person on the planet or die trying"

    Once again I'd be like



    And I'd go down fighting

    Stop talking. Stop trying to prove points. We don't need points. Either do justice or let's just get it on for the last time and for the final time

    Period.
    He explains the points so people like you can understand. It isn't about you being black or white is just because you are a total fuckwit with a inferiority complex, nobody else here gives a crap about colour only you.
    Beanz is a jew , I am white , Rey is Hispanic , Master is Indian and your a cunt, see we didnt need to bring colour into it to prove a point.
    Yes I'm inferior. Yes I'm a fkwit

    Now what ?

    Get to the doing part.


    You're in the wrong thread, Denilson. You have a dozen other threads in which to spout your racist nonsense. This one specifically says is for keeping it civil...... although kudos to @Dark Lord Al for putting things perfectly into perspective.
    Says the guy who posted a picture of a bridge and suggested another poster not only jump from it to their death, but be sure to post a picture before doing so. TitoFan you would not know civil if it came up politely and told you you to remove your head from your own bottom.
    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,825
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2038
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The "Can We Keep it Civil?" Thread

    Ah..... an appearance by one of the famed "Fenny & Beanie" brothers.

    My dear Beanie. You've got plenty of other threads in which to spill your vitriol and hatred. Why not leave this one for its original intent, which is to come in here only if you have something constructive to say in a polite, civil, and mature fashion.

    I'm pretty sure you can find plenty of other threads if this one is not to your liking.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-10-2019, 12:15 AM
  2. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-03-2017, 02:14 PM
  3. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-27-2012, 10:25 PM
  4. Replies: 157
    Last Post: 11-09-2011, 08:36 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing