easy steps to follow, all hushed-up in the MSM:
1. Hilary Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS and FOREIGN AGENTS Christopher Steele (UK), Josef Mifsud (Malta), and Australian agents to COMPILE A PHONY DOSSIER ON TRUMP.
2. Phony Dossier was leaked by Brennan (CIA) and others in US to the NYTimes paper, which breathlessly published the unverified lies and smears.
3. FBI and CIA then say OH MY GOD, OH MY GOD, LOOK WHAT THE TIMES PAPER HAS REVEALED! We need an investigations!
4. Phony Dossier was used BY OBAMA AND HIS APPOINTEES (comey, clapper, Brennan, etc) to apply for AND OBTAIN Foriegn Surveilance Intelligence Court (FISA) to obtain search warrants and wiretaps ON tRUMP
5. On 4 separate occassions, PHONY DOSSIER WAS USED AT FISA court to RE-NEW the warrants against Trump EVEN THOUGH COMEY SAID NUMEROUS TIMES ON RECORD IT WAS SALACIOUS AND UNVERIFIED
6. FISA abuse involed crooked agents ignoring EXCULPATRY EVIDENCE AS WELL AS RE-NEWING WARRANTS WHILST KNOWING the Phony Dosser was FAKE< PHONY< UNCVERIFIED AND SALACIOUS.
7. Corroboration e-mails obtained by Trump PROVE FBI WAS GUNNING FOR TRUMP, "insurance policy in case he wins" etc.... what was the "insurance policy?" ....
8. THE PHONY ROBERT MUELLER "IGNORE ALL EXCULAPTRY EVIDENCE" WITCH HUNT INVESTIGATION, lasting 3 years and costing $30 mill
after it crashed abnnd burnt, Mueller was disgraced and the dems and MSM bootlickers were DISGRACED IN PERDITION, but never apologized, then in pure shame and embarrasment they .......
9. WENT AFTER THE HONORABLE WILLIAM BARR ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE us of A
10. Now going after a nothing-hamburger Ukraine call that Ukraine Prez says NEVER HAPPENED, NO PRESSURE, etc.
the 24/7 Never-Trumpet MSM unhinged lackeys and globalist agenda "anchor" people and late-night talk shows, NYtimes, CNN, Washington post, etc.. A DISGRACE LIKE NEVER EVER SEEN BEFORE.
The rules were not changed Lyle. This article appeared on the internet and Trump and the rest of the GOP rushed to use it as evidence that the deep state had changed the rules so the whistleblower could blow the whistle. However the intelligence community Inspector General, the man who handles whistleblower complaints and a Trump appointee, has subequently gone public and said the article is completely wrong, that a. the rules regarding second hand information haven't changed, second hand information has always been acceptable as evidence in a whistleblower complaint and b. the Trump whistleblower has first hand information after all. What part of this don't you understand?
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/...onspiracy.html
Two days. Two days and everything already fell off your little shelf. I'll cut and paste the stuff from two days ago.
There isn't a transcript, there's a selectively edited White House memorandum of the conversation. From the time they gave the conversation lasting there should be about three times more words than they've so far shared. They scrapped the original transcript and stored an edited version in a top secret location instead of where it was meant to be kept where dozens of officials could access it for some reason. They've done whis with dozens of calls apparently.
Here's Fox news judge somethingorother on whether Trump broke the law or not:
Judge Napolitano: Trump has admitted committing crime in talks with Ukraine
and a video too
https://www.foxnews.com/media/judge-...admitted-crime
Even conservative news outlets have said he's bang to rights. The Washington Examiner, both editorial and various legal scholars (don't have time to find a link) and the premier conservative outlet, the National Review :
I haven’t been a litigator since 2015. I haven’t conducted a proper cross-examination since 2014. But if I couldn’t walk a witness, judge, and jury through the transcript of Donald Trump’s call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and demonstrate that a quid pro quo was more likely than not, then I should just hang up my suit and retire in disgrace. Far from being “scattershot” — as my esteemed colleague Kyle Smith declares — the actual sequence is extremely tight, and the asks are very clear.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...-quid-pro-quo/
And here's a scene from the Godfather with the language from the White House "transcript" added:
https://twitter.com/LarryNoble_DC/st...59931033034759
Also, too:
After the call, multiple officials told the whistle-blower that future talks between Mr. Trump and Mr. Zelensky would depend on whether the Ukranians would “play ball” on the investigations.
I'm guessing Trump will be happy for all these officials to testify under oath to the impeachment inquiry.
And you don't have news for me Lyle, you have a bunch of whackadoodle conspiracy theories that you're too chickenshit to articulate. I have to say Lyle, if Trump is just waiting to drop the hammer and cart off all the deep state Democrats from Obama and Hillary on down then this would be the perfect theatrical moment to do it. It's going to happen any day now. You fucking nut, you gullible fucking moron.
Thank you for the many insults as per usual.
Given your stance all we can do now is wait and see who is correct at the end of it. Best of luck.
Yes Lyle. Will it be the intelligence agencies of various foreign countries and a bunch of American law enforcement professionals with, uh, unimpeachable reputations who have dedicated their lives to upholding the US constitution and enforcing the law including decorated military veterans or will it be a racist fraudster serial bankrupt money laundering sex criminal who since he entered the political arena has seen his campaign manager, replacement campaign manager, personal attorney, National Security Advisor and various other campaign operatives be convicted of felonies/serve jail time. Of course Trump is already an unindicted co conspirator in the charges that sent his attorney to jail. And now this impeachment thing -- coercing the leader of a foreign nation to fabricate charges against his main political rival. And apparently repeating this crime in public today at a press conference.
Which of us will be proved correct? It really could go either way.
Guess all that defense goes out the window when a President stands in front of the cameras and invites China to investigate candidates and interfere in U.S elections. Nope you just can't make that shat up.
Any American defending that has checked love of Country at the door.
The Barr thing is unreal. The Attorney General flying round the world trying to get foreign governments to contradict the evidence they've already produced in the Trump Russia investigation. You have Trump, his dodgy AG, Rudy and two GOP lawyers conducting an investigation that circumvents the entire US law enforcement system.
Way back in the year 2016 I can remember when the Attorney General having a brief public meeting with the husband of the subject of a criminal investigation was grounds for her to be investigated and locked up. It was called treasonous. I wonder if I searched for what Lyle had to say about Loretta Lynch on the tarmac with Clinton what I'd find.
Now we have Trump's AG, one of the subjects of the criminal whistleblower complaint and a man who should be therefore recused from anything to do with Trump-Russia flying round the world conducting his own investigation into US law enforcement. It's a sight to see.
I never read in this world any rules about newbie using italics, fonts, all caps, punctuation marks or bold script or not, within or without a certain number of posts... plus the hole text of points I hit you hard on above you skirted around it by saying "newbie" etc. Its like msm, when hit hard by those same points above, just like to distract to other points.
Yeah really gets the old noggin' a joggin' doesn't it? Why start with this Impeachment Inquiry?They have the votes in the House, up or down vote, Democrats win, they get to start the actual impeachment process......and yet they aren't doing it.....
....but yeah, nah, yeah I'm sure it's nothing
There are currently 14 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 14 guests)
Bookmarks