Have some lunatic fringe elements taken over the humanities?

[Fatboxingfan]

That conclusion suffers from a lack of parallelism.

It's all there, you were wrong.

Invalid enthymeme.

You were wrong.

You're just using the negative form of a universal affirmative, which is invalid, B.

[Alpha]

That conclusion suffers from a lack of parallelism.

It's all there, you were wrong.

Invalid enthymeme.

You were wrong.

You're just using the negative form of a universal affirmative, which is invalid, B.

"There are no 200,000 properties since 1990" This is incorrect.

[Fatboxingfan]

That lacks parallelism. And suffers wildly from the particular affirmative fallacy.

[Alpha]

That lacks parallelism. And suffers wildly from the particular affirmative fallacy.

Poor little guy, can't admit when he's wrong.

[Fatboxingfan]

That lacks parallelism. And suffers wildly from the particular affirmative fallacy.

Poor little guy, can't admit when he's wrong.

How can I be wrong when all your statements suffer from fallacies?

[Alpha]

That lacks parallelism. And suffers wildly from the particular affirmative fallacy.

Poor little guy, can't admit when he's wrong.

How can I be wrong when all your statements suffer from fallacies?

You were wrong and are having trouble admittig it. Poor little guy.

[Fatboxingfan]

That lacks parallelism. And suffers wildly from the particular affirmative fallacy.

Poor little guy, can't admit when he's wrong.

How can I be wrong when all your statements suffer from fallacies?

You were wrong and are having trouble admittig it. Poor little guy.

That was no better either, as it's just a fallacy of illicit major.