Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
canelo will still be p4p number 1 this time next year. his legend continues to grow
Still? Who has him at #1?
ring magazine, tbrb, boxrec, me
Ring magazine doesn’t count because who runs it. Very biased. Boxrec aren’t real rankings. Most reputable sources still have him at #3
i can't help that you don't like the answer
Well I’m just letting you know that if anyone uses boxrec and acts like it’s a legitimate ranking system then you are proving yourself to be unknowledgable about boxrec. And everybody who knows anything knows that Ring would obviously put Canelo first.

Maybe if you would have researched and found more reputable sources then your point of him being #1 p4p “still” would make sense. But at it stands, basically you think he is #1 along with a computer and his own team. You can think what you want, but I’m just letting you know that no other real sources think that he’s #1.
you asked, i answered, i can't help that you don't like the answer. tell me, is p4p a legitimate ranking system? you are now putting stipulations on your question "who has him at #1?" which do not relate to my answer and telling me i needed to research to satisfy your opinion. my reply perfectly answers your question
His mom probably has him at #1 too. You should have included her. See how ridiculous that sounds? That’s why there are reputable sources and non reputable sources. That’s what I’m trying to tell you.

You can put him at whatever number you want, but the whole argument is that you said he will “still” be #1 p4p. If you would have ended that statement with “on my list” then it would have been fine. I would have disagreed but the claim would have at least made sense.
it's not just my list though is it? you asked who? i answered with some examples. in your opinion those examples aren't reputable, others would disagree with you. there are more i could list but then i would have to check with you if each is acceptable to your standards. p4p is subjective or do you think it is a legitimate ranking system? my statement made sense. he is number one p4p according to others and myself and will still be number one this time next year. i don't agree with lomachenko being number one on some lists, or crawford but i wouldn't call those sources not real, because p4p has no set criteria