Orthodox Jews murdered by 2 Black Hebrew Israelites in Jersey City NJ

[Denilson-The-Comeback]

I have said that the science tells us that there are group differences. There is no denial of that, the only questions are why and to what extent. Obviously there will be many black people with IQ's way above average and Asians well bellow average, but the trend is that overall Asians have higher IQ's than Caucasians and in turn they have higher IQ's than blacks. It has nothing to do with superiority.

So let me get this straight.

You're saying that the science tell us that white and Asian people are intellectually superior to black people but then you say that this has nothing to do with the intellectual superiority of white n Asian people have over black people.



If you can’t see the irony embedded in your remarks then you’re probably not prepared to enter a dialogue about much of anything.

I've said this before

What I can not understand is this : Why can’t you be just a racist ? Why do you need these pseudos scientifical explanations? What is wrong with racism? You do promote it, so why be a shame of it?

Just say “N****S are stupid.”? And be done.

That's mystery to me.

It's like in the bell curve were they basically suggests that we might as well stop making progress in further research for finding the true factors and blindly accept them as a natural law.

Like you they think they have found the ultimate explanation of everything and any other research can halt now. But then, at the same time, they take a nostalgic look backwards to philosophies of long gone centuries where the unwashed masses of dumb sheep are at the mercy of an elite. An elite who alone have the power to choose when they are generous and when they are punitive.

There are a lot of research papers written on this topic. Here is one easily searched. Have a read, look at the research it references, counter it with different research if you like. There is reams of literature on this subject which is frankly controversial because it upsets people. You have this thing with racism and superiority whilst I frankly don't get upset by any of it and have to live in a country where the average IQ is higher than my own. Oh the horror. https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfreds...sen30years.pdf

That "science" paper in the above link (for some reason the link isn't working now) were written by Phillip Rushton and Arthur Jensen. Both of whom are dead I may add.

Dr. Phillipe Rushton was exposed as a fraud and racist. So try again.

Like other racists with an agenda, he has expounded upon the innate inferiority of blacks in particular. He is also another weirdo obsessed with black men's genitals and ‘high’ testosterone’ levels. This is the man who in 1988, conducted a survey at the Eaton Center (Canada) in Toronto where 50 whites, 50 blacks, and 50 Asians were paid to answer questions about their sexual habits. He asked their genital size and how far they could ejaculate and then he just couched it in jargon and academic terms.

It boils down to men’s sexuality and their feelings of inferiority.

"Asian men are the smartest, hence they have the smallest peckers. The white men are next, but have slightly bigger peckers than the smartest Asians. They're just right! The blacks have the biggest peckers, thus the smallest brains."

You don't feel superior to a black man and you know it. So you have to over compensate with this IQ thing.

Plus Rushton’s work was funded by a highly conservative right-wing think tank (Pioneer Fund) and it generally got trashed by peer reviewers for many of the reasons which I’ve brought up in the past.

The Pioneer fund paid for much of the research behind The Bell Curve.

So your scientific sources are from the very people who funded a book about trying to prove that black people are stupid.

So using these as a source for race and intelligence is like me using Ronald McDonald as a source for information on vegetarians.

The Pioneer fund and Rushton and Jensen are all about eugenics, that thing about making the human race better through selective breeding. Hitler rose to power and took US eugenic laws as a model. And then went one step further: extermination.

Hitler gave eugenics a bad name.

But the eugenic mindset lives on. You see it in the likes of Richard Spencer and Jared Taylor.

Why don’t the Eugenists ever choose themselves to be the first to be rid of?

Rushton wouldn’t have been doing much science at all if it wasn’t for funding from people who have vested political interests in proving the genetic superiority or inferiority of this or that group.

When you look at the both of them (Ruston and Jensen)

• Arthur Jensen was a Psychologist.
• J. Philippe Rushton was a Psychologist

Notice anything strange ?

Where is the biologists or anthropologists or geneticists ?

I mean they're and you're trying to prove the inferiority of certain races then get me the biologists or anthropologists or geneticists to prove it.

Biologists, anthropologists and geneticists are the very people who study these things for a living.

You are trying to hijack science in the same way that people hijack religion.............. to promote your agenda.

The problem is : Unlike in religion, science is far less open to interpretation. Which is you fail so often.

You're talking points sound good when your talking sh*t to your non white girlfriend or family and friends.

They sound good when no-one is their to check them

Start with this

Define “race” in humans in scientific terms first. That is, unambiguously and universal throughout the world, not only the USA