Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
Ryder was not robbed, it was a close fight. Callum should have won it far more easily. That is as crazy as you saying Canelo ruined GGG in their first fight.
better get your eyes checked. giving callum five rounds is more than generous. are you terry o'connor? i'm still trying to work out when ggg stopped being a risk
So if it is possible to give Callum Smith 5 rounds then it surely can not be a robbery.

I watched their fight and think I had it a draw but to use that as an excuse that Canelo should not fight him is a bit weak. It would be Canelo's toughest challenge at super middle.

GGG is always a risk, never said he was not.
i said it would be generous to give callum five rounds, meaning not more than or at the most. i'm want canelo fighting the best, i saw ryder clearly beating callum, so he is the better opponent for me. ryder is the tougher challenge at supermiddleweight, and if you had that fight a draw, then i don't understand how you can consider callum a tougher challenge than ryder, john was considered an easy fight for callum

i also think ggg was a risk, i never said you did, some try to imply he wasn't
Callum had an off night and many fighters have them because they are not motivated. Callum smashed Groves into retirement and when focused is very dangerous. He is huge for the weight and will probably move up if he can not get the fight with Canelo.
callum may have had an off night but he should have lost. groves was coming of an injury and was damaged goods. he could fight saunders, but both don't want to take a risk and are holding out for the canelo golden ticket. callum should give ryder a rematch
To be fair most fighters are waiting for Canelo to give them a call. Hopefully it does not stagnate Smith career and he moves on if he is not chosen.