Impeachment

[Kirkland Laing]

Again you asking for the right to no reply just like your pussy president. Those are not the terms of engagement. The forum is not a safe space for you and Gandalf to be indulged in indefinitely.

Not quite. I'm asking for a discussion which you don't want because YOU want the right of no reply.

Everyone bar 'You Guys'. Have you not noticed how you 5 are just talking to each other and actually for 90% of the time it is just you and El 'Trust Fund hipster' Kabong ?

I guess when you're a benefits scrounger everyone looks like Daddy Warbucks.

I never called you a benefits scrounger, because I would be astounded if considering the years you have wasted on here, you would be willing to put in the effort needed to pick up a pen.

And you don't want a discussion at all. You hector and berate, mock and look down your nose with derision at anyone like Kirkland who has the decency and patience to indulge your teenage bullshit.

Heh.... Now who is confused?

I'm calling YOU a benefits scrounger.

Kirkland has neither decency nor patience. Kirkland is a giant fan of Paul Krugman, the economic font of knowledge who has been wrong about absolutely EVERYTHING. Example...

Paul Krugman has a long track record of being right about economics. He was right about the 2008 meltdown, predicting it in 2005. He's been right about every twist and turn of the economy since the 2008 meltdown too but you wouldn't know because you don't read anything he writes and don't understand anything about economics. The thing you posted here proves my point. This quote is from an article he wrote in the nineties for a series of light hearted articles for which NYT writers were asked to come up with predictions about the future about a subject they didn't normally cover for the Times that they thought would be proved wrong in time. Flying cars and so on.



Somebody chopped this piece out of the article to fool all the ignorant easily fooled motherfuckers out there. There's a whole industry out there of people producing misleading crap to make Krugman look bad and that's because he's been so accurate about the economic events of the last few decades and all the economists on the conservative side of the argument have had decades of theories and predictions shredded to bits by the events of the past couple of decades to the extent that they don't ever talk about economics anymore. Seriously, right wing/conservative/free market economists don't actually produce any work anymore. They either just repeat stuff that has been comprehensively disproved by events or more sensibly shut the fuck up.